My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
94-023
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952 - 1999
>
1994
>
94-023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:31:01 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 10:46:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
94-23
Date
5/16/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 94-023 <br /> <br />4Gl <br /> <br />MIXED-USE RETAIL/OFFICE ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />The Mixed-Use Retail/Office Alternative would result in 157,000 square feet of new <br />construction, resulting in a shopping center 20% smaller than the proposed project. <br />With the existing restaurant and bank, the shopping center development under this <br />alternative would total approximately 173,000 square feet, for a total of 78,012 square <br />feet of supermarket, 60,000 square feet of office space, 18,090 square feet of retail, <br />and 898 square feet of restaurant added to the existing restaurant on site. With the <br />exception of the supermarket, this alternative would not include the neighborhood <br />commercial component. Compared to the project and other development alternatives, <br />this alternative would be the environmentally superior alternative. <br /> <br />Although the impacts from this alternative would be similar to the project impacts in <br />the areas of light and glare and geology and hydrology, it would lessen impacts in the <br />areas of traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, and public services and utilities. <br /> <br />Compared to the project, this alternative would generate approximately 142 fewer <br />trips during the a.m. peak hours (or 269; less) and 722 fewer trips during the p.m. <br />peak hours (or 419; less). Compared to the proposed project, this alternative would <br />reduce CO emissions by 744.26 pounds per day, ROC by 81.05 pounds per day, NOx <br />by 68.18 pounds per day, and PMm by 9.16 pounds per day. Although this would <br />represent a reduction in these emissions, they would still exceed SCAQMD threshold <br />limits for CO, ROC, and NO.. <br /> <br />This alternative would reduce construction noise impacts and would reduce noise from <br />vehicle trips and deliveries. This alternative would consume 13% less building <br />energy than the project. Use of vehicle fuel would increase 1.3 million gallons per <br />year over existing uses, but would result in 43% less consumption than the proposed <br />project. Water consumption would be 26% less than the proposed project and solid <br />waste generated would be 26% less. <br /> <br />REDUCED INTENSITY ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />The Reduced Intensity Alternative would retain the existing uses and develop the site <br />with a varied land use that would be consistent with the general character of the area. <br />This alternative would include new construction of a 78,012 square foot superstore, <br />46,090 square feet of specialty retail, and 898 square feet of restaurant space. Net <br />development in addition to the existing uses would be 125,000 square feet. This <br />alternative would be a neighborhood commercial center similar to the proposed <br />project, but of reduced density. <br /> <br />Although the impacts from this alternative would be similar to the project impacts in <br />the areas of light and glare and geology and hydrology, it would lessen impacts in the <br />areas of traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, and public services and utilities. <br /> <br />scsS626 -S3- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.