Laserfiche WebLink
025 <br /> <br />All future development within the Project Areas will be required to meet the minimum <br />requirements of the State Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24). A project must <br />meet Title 24 energy requirements before building permits are issued. <br /> <br />Schools <br /> <br />The development of additional projects in the Project Ayeas through the use of eminent domain <br />could generate additional students to areas schools, some which may be either at or over their <br />student capacity. <br /> <br />Prior to issuance of a building permit for individual residential projects, an analysis shall be <br />prepared and submitted to the affected school district to determine the impact to existing <br />district enrollment capacities. Payment of necessary developer fees shall be implemented <br />as a part of the project construction. <br /> <br />VIII_ ALTERNATIVES TO TIlE PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(b) requires a discussion of reasonable alternatives to the <br />proposed project or to the location of the project. An EIR need not consider an alternative whose <br />implementation is remote or speculative (see Residents Ad Hoc Stadium Committee vs. Board of <br />Trustees (1979) 89 Cal. App. 3d 274). <br /> <br />No Project Alternative <br /> <br />Finding 3: <br /> <br />Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation <br />measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. <br /> <br />Facts in Support of the Finding <br /> <br />This project alternative will prevent the Agency from acquking property through the use of <br />eminent domain. Should the Agency need to acquire property to remove blight and improve <br />economic conditions, eminent domain would not be available as a tool for the Agency to acquire <br />the property. This alternative will prevent any assistance the Agency could provide the City <br />towards removing existing blight and improving the business and economic climate within the <br />Project Areas and the City of Santa Ana. Since no significant adverse environmental impacts <br />associated with adoption and implementation of the proposed Plan Amendment have been <br />identified, this aiternative will not eliminate any significant environmental impacts. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />