Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-004 'I'IME: lC'; ~'7~-A. ~, <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />SANTA ANA VACATING THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY <br />NORTH OF FIRST STREET BETVVEEN HARBOR <br />BOULEVARD AND FIGUEROA STREET (ABANDONMENT <br />NO. 00-03) <br /> <br /> BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS <br />FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby, finds, determines and <br />declares as follows: <br /> <br />The City Council of the City of Santa Ana adopted, on November 20, 2000, <br />Resolution No. 2000-070 wherein it declared its intention to vacate, <br />pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 3 of Part 3 of <br />Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California that a <br />portion of the alley immediately north of First Street between Harbor <br />Boulevard and Figueroa Street as shown on Exhibit I attached hereto. <br /> <br />Said Resolution gave notice that at its meeting of January 2, 2001, at 6:00 <br />p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter could be heard, this Council would <br />hear any and all persons interested in or objecting to said proposed <br />vacations of the said street. <br /> <br />Co <br /> <br />This Council finds that said Resolution has been published in the manner <br />prescribed by law for the publishing of ordinances of the City. <br /> <br />This Council further finds that notices of said proposed street vacation <br />stating the purposes of said Resolution and the time and place set for <br />hearing were posted as directed by the Council and required by law. <br /> <br />This Council at the time and place set for hearing heard any and all persons <br />interested in or objecting to said proposed vacation of said alley and <br />received and considered all evidence submitted. <br /> <br />This Council finds from all the evidence submitted that the said alley is <br />unnecessary for present or prospective public use, based upon the <br />following findings of fact: <br /> <br />Said alley is not necessary to provide access to abutting property <br />owners; and <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2001-004 <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />