Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Councilm~n Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Harvey and carried <br />that the City Council grant the appeal and instruct the Chief of Police to <br />issue an operator's permit to Mr. Green. <br /> <br />~ APP. ~89 - Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Amendment <br />BODNAR Application ~89 filed by John Bodnar <br /> proposing to amend Sectional District Map <br /> 8-5-9 by reclassifying from the R 2 to <br />the C 5 district property at the southeast corner of 4th Street and McClay. <br />Planning Ccmmnission Resolution 5670 recommended denial. <br /> <br />The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was published in The Register on <br />February 29, 196~ and that no written communications had been received. Dale <br />Heinly, 611 W. 8th, attorney for the applicant, requested that the hearing be <br />continued to May 18, 196~. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Gilmore and carried, <br />Council continued the hearing to May 18, 1964, 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chamber. <br /> <br />APPEAL 121 - Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Appeal <br />S~J. 0IL CO. 121 filed by Shell 0il Company appealing <br /> condition requiring street dedication <br /> imposed by the Zondng Administrator in <br />his approval of Variance Application 1895, to relocate two free standing signs <br />in the setback area at 220 W. 17th Street. <br /> <br />The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was mailed to adjacent property <br />owners on Narch 9, 196~ and that no written cc.....unications had been received. <br />George Murphy, 9829 E. Oak Street, Belmont, representing the appellant, <br />stated that the two signs involved were not being relocated, but were being <br />replaced at the same location and height, and to require dedication was <br />imposing a penalty; that the ccmpany was willing to move the sign when right <br />of way is required. There being no further testimony, the hearing was closed. <br /> <br />0~ mo$1on of Cou~cll~lan Hubbard, seconded by Councilman Gilmore and carried, <br />C~cil ~verrule~ the actioa of the Z~ing A~ministrator and instructed the <br />City Attoraey to prepare a resolution granting the appeal. <br /> <br />APPEAL 122- Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Appeal <br />ROBB 122 filed by W. F. Robb, appealing the <br /> Zoning Administrator' s denial of <br /> Variance Application 1~91 to construct <br />two one-bedromm apartment units on au R 1 lot having an existing single family <br />residence and to reduce required rear yard at 705 Orange Avenue. <br /> <br />The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing was mailed to adjacent property <br />owners on March 9, 1964 and that no written c.~?,~'.Auications had been received. <br />August Lillaud, 988 N. Cambridge, Orange, representing the appellant, cmapared <br />the property to others nearby which were granted variances, and also stated <br />that the property is about 75 feet wide instead of 50 feet as reported in <br />the Findings of Fact. <br /> <br />David H. Dicksou 701 Orange, protested that there would be insufficient parking <br />and an increase in noise. Henry Feenhouse, 316 E. Bishop, and Mrs. Dicks~ <br />also spoke in opposition. <br /> <br />W. F. Robb, appel!~t, stated a garage is proposed for each unit. There being <br />no further testimony, the Bearing was closed. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Schlueter and carried, <br />Ce~ucil overruled the action of the Zoning Administrator and instructed the City <br />Attorney to prepare a resolution granting, subject to applicable couditions, <br />Variance 1891. <br /> <br />CIT~ C0UNC~L <br /> <br />~arch 16, 196~ <br /> <br /> <br />