Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-081 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUMMARY VACATION <br />OF A 5.83 FEET WIDE BY 102.00 FEET LONG PARKWAY <br />STRIP OF BAKER STREET BE'rVVEEN RIVIERA DRIVE <br />AND SANTIAGO CREEK <br /> <br />bk:l 1/09/01 <br /> <br /> BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS <br />FOLLOWS: <br /> <br /> Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Aha hereby finds, determines <br />and declares as follows: <br /> <br />The City of Santa Ana intends to vacate a 5.83 feet wide by 102.00 feet <br />long parkway strip of Baker Street between Riviera Drive and Santiago <br />Creek (Exhibit A) pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of <br />Chapter 3 of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code of the <br />State of California. <br /> <br />The vacation of the 5.83 feet wide by 102.00 feet long parkway strip of <br />Baker Street between Riviera Drive and Santiago Creek is a summary <br />vacation because the parkway lies within property under one ownership <br />pursuant to the provisions of section 8334 of the Streets and Highway <br />Code of the State of California. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilkinson, the applicant, is currently remodeling his home's kitchen at <br />1151 Riviera Drive. He desires to build an exterior landscaped courtyard <br />next to the new kitchen bay window, which is adjacent to the property line. <br />The summary vacation is necessary in order to meet the five feet setback <br />requirement (Exhibit 1). <br /> <br />The parkway strip of Baker Street to be vacated is not necessary for traffic <br />circulation. <br /> <br />Pursuant to the provisions of section 892 of the Streets and Highway <br />Code of the State of California, the parkway strip of Baker Street is not <br />useful as a nonmotorized transportation facility, as defined in section 887 <br />of said Code. <br /> <br />The parkway strip of Baker Street to be vacated contains no existing <br />overhead or underground utilities. <br /> <br />All affected utility companies have been contacted and do not object to the <br />vacation. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2001-081 <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />