|
O~ motion* 5f CoUnCi~ Harvey, secOnded bY Councilman Hubbar~ and carried,
<br />cOUn~IIupheld the action of the zoning AdminiStrator and instructed the City
<br />Attorney to prepare a resolution denying Variance
<br />
<br />HEARING - APPEAL 135 Mayor Hall opened the hearing on Appeal
<br />STATER BROSo 135 filed by Starer Bros. Markets from
<br /> the Zoning Administrator's denial of
<br />· ' Variance 1989 to cOnstruct a 53' high
<br />free standing sign a~l to eliminate required landscaping strip between adJacen$
<br />residences at 26Bo Edinger, The Clerk reported that notice of the hearing
<br />wAS' ~iled to adjacent property ~wners on August 28, 196~ un~ that no
<br />co~aaunications had been received.
<br />
<br />%~a~n SwalIen, 1~6~ Cranden Drive, Walnut, spoke on behalf of the appel!a~t,
<br />stating that 700' of land~cap~ would[ be require~ with a tree every 10 feet,
<br />an~ that signwas too Bulky for 35' height. Robert Scott, 2713 Wo Pomona, urged
<br />COUncil to require the ~a-dscaping, which would form a buffer to noise and light
<br />for residences. The plan~ing Director stated that in 1960 the requirements of
<br />set-back and landscaping were ma~e to off-set signs higher than 3~ feet.
<br />
<br />C. V. Broom, P. O. Bc~ 1~0, Colton, engineer for Starer Bros., stated the
<br />resi~eaces were ~00' away; that parking woul~ be lost if landscaping required;
<br />explained that the stan~ax~l sign for the ~arkete required placement at 53'; that
<br />a six foot block wall would be placed on the south and east of the property, and
<br />that trees could Be given to neighboring property o~ners for planting. Peter
<br />Spulizzi, 2717 W. 17th, spoke in opposition.
<br />
<br />On motion of Councilman ~ub~ard, seconded by Councilm~u Harvey and carrie~,
<br />Council overrule~ the action of the Zoning A4~inistrator and instructe~ the
<br />City Attorney to prepare a resolution granting, subject to applicable conditions,
<br />the appeal to permit erection of a 5~' sign with deletion of landscaping
<br />requirement.
<br />
<br />HEAR~ - A.A. ~71 Nayor Hall opened the hearing continued
<br />~ from A~t 3, 1~ ~ ~n~ent
<br /> A~cati~ ~71 filed by ~u~ah ~locE
<br /> to ~en~ ~ctio~l District ~p 20-~-9
<br />by p~z~i~ fr~ the C~ty M 1 to the City R l, R 2, R ~, P, C ~ and C 5
<br />districts, p~y ~ both aides of Ritch~ ~ ~er a~r~te~ 2500'
<br />s~th; ~i~ C~asi~ ~es~lut~on ~6~ ~c~en~ed denial.
<br />
<br />On ~otin~ of Couacilman ~ubbar~, seconded by Councilman Schlueter and carried,
<br />letters in ~pposition from the following were ordered filed~ Santa Fe Land
<br />2mprovement Co., 121 E. 6th, Los Au~eles; The ~endix Corp., 1001 S. Gran~;
<br />Allergan Pharmaceuticals, 1000 S. Graad; ~arotta Valve Corp., 2215 Standard;
<br />Certified Industrial Properties, Inc., lkl~ N. Broadway; and D~wntown Santa Ana
<br />Associat ion.
<br />
<br />At the request of the applicant, it was moved by Cotmcilman ~ubbard, seconded
<br />by Councilman Schlueter and carrie~, that the hearing be continued to SeptemBer 21,
<br />196~, 7:3~ p.m. in the Council Chamber, 217 North Main Street.
<br />
<br />OI~INANCE NS-7~i OBDINANCE NS-7~I REPEALING C~i~TER 7
<br />~I~TION OF F~ OF ~IC~ III ~ T~ ~A A~
<br /> ~C~AL C~E (~TI~ 0F ~)
<br /> ~s ~a~ ~ title. It ~s ~ve~ by
<br />C~ci~n Hubba~, sec~ea By C~ct~--- ~ey, that ~her re~ be
<br />~ive~ a~ O~i~nce NS-7~I be adopted. ~ roll call vote:
<br />
<br />AYES, CO~CIL~:
<br />NOES,
<br />AB~E~T, C~CII~:
<br />
<br />HuBBard, Harvey, Schlueter, Hall
<br />None
<br />Gilmore
<br />
<br />September 8, 196~
<br />
<br />
<br />
|