07-06-1965 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~EARING - Mayor Harvey announced that this was the ASSESS. DIST. 227 time and place fixed by Resolution 65-94 for hearing protests or objections to the propose~ work, the extent of the proposed assessment district or the proposed grades in Assessment. District 227 (Figmeroa- Fifth) and the hearing on whether public convenience and necessity require such improvements, a~d whether the same shomld be ordered without applicatio~ of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation an~ Majority Protest Act of 1931~ On motion of Councilm-u Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Nerrin and carried, the Affidavit of Publication and the Certificates of Mailing and Posting Notice of Hearing were ordered filed. Franklin T~ Hamilton, 611 Wilshire, Los Angeles, Special Counsel for the City, explained the purpose of the hearing. Ronal~ Wolford, Director of Public Works, testified concerming the nature of the work and the extent of the assessment district, stating that in his opinion all lots and parcels of within the proposed assessment district will be benefited by the proposed work. The Clerk read a letter of protest received from the Honorable George B. Honold, Mayor of the City of Garden Grove~ opposing inclusion of a strip of land 746 feet long and 150 feet deep on the west side of the Willowick Golf Course, since no benefit would accrue to the golf course. Tom Huebner, Administrative Assistant, City of Garden Grove, reviewed the steps leading to Garden Grovels interest in purchasing Willowick GoLf Course, .and stated that the Garden Grove City Council was concerned with long range planning to maintain the area as a recreational facility and that it should be considered a park. Ne quoted from Section 5301 of the Streets & Highways Code regarding permissible ommission of publicly owned land from assessment. Mr. Nuebner protested the entire inclusion of the golf course property and specifically the 746 feet on the west side and the parcel east of unimproved Clinton Street and Fifth Street. Mro Hamilton advised the Council that the property is owned by a non-profit organization amd that no exemption is provided un~er Section 53G1 for such organizations$ that the Council shoul~ disregar~ presant land uses since uses can c~-~Ee. The Pmblic Works Director testified the property is benefitted because it can be drained by gravity flow, and reported that the written protest represente~l approximately 5% of the area of the property to be assessed for the proposed imprevmaemto There being no further test~mony~ the RESOL~TI0~ 65-156 OF THE Clef C~CIL OF THE ¢ITT OF S~A OF C~ WO~ A~ ~ G~ OF N~ICE ~IT~G B~S ~ ~s ~ad by title~ It ~s ~d by O~cN~--- ~r~l~ second~ By O~cil~- ~, that ~her ~g be ~i~d ~ Resol~i~ 65-1~ be ad~edo ~ roll call v~e: AYES~ CO~NC~: NOES, COUNCILMEN: ABSENT, COb-NC ILMEN: Gilmore, ~rooks, ~urk, Herrin, Markel, McNichael, Harvey None RE~. 65-107 RESOLUTION 65-107 ~F THE ClTY C~I*CIL OF WAGE RATES TNE C/TY OF SA~A A~ ~L~O~ D~ ~ G~L ~A~ ~ OF ~ DI~ WAG~ ~R ~AL HOL~AT A~ O~ WO~ ~ SA~ C~ ~R C~A~ C~ OR ~P~ OF WO~ ~S ~ad ~ title. It ~s moved by Co~ci~ Gi~o~, seceded ~ C~ci~ ~rkel, that ~her reading ~ waived ~ Resoluti~ 65-107 be adopted. ~ roll call vote: CIT C0U C'rL - 299 - 'uly 6,