02-07-1966 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Keith Monroe, representing the applicants, stated exterior remodeling would be required and proposal would benefit neighborhood; that the Planning Commission considered the CD zoning, which was not in effect and therefore not evidence. Mr. Tom Keenan presented artist's rendering of proposed exterior and agreed to any conditions and time limit. There being no further testimony, the hearing was closed. The Planning Director stated this was a rezoning request in the face of a publicly announced acquisition by a governmental agency; that the property is within the area to be acquired under the Joint Powers Agreement by the County; that the Commission had followed past policy of not approving conversions in the Civic Center area unless they were tantamount to new construction and the ~xterior remodeling had not been presented to Commission. The applicant stated it had only just ccme to his attention that the County had sent a letter of intent to purchase the property; that applicants were not owners but had option to buy; that exterior drawing was not submitted to Commission because it was felt that was of concern only to Building Department. Councilman McMichael noted the proposal was substandard in driveway, parking, and maneuvering area. It was moved by Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Burk and carried, that Council uphold the action of the Planning Commission and the City Attorney be instructed to prepare a resolution denying Variance Application 2202, 17TH ST. SIGNS - GLASS & Hinsvark George Glass and Kenneth Ninsvark presented request that permit for sign (Bird) at 1621 E. 17th be held in abeyance until law suit is resolved, and request for discussion of sign control on 17th Street. Mayor Harvey suggested the arguments be presented to the Judge inasmuch as the matter was now in Court and that any suggestions for sign control be presented to the Planning Staff, who were making a study at Council direction. RECESS At 8:50 p.m., a five minute recess was declared. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. with all Councilmen present. TENT. PARCEL MAP ~47 It was moved by Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, that Tentative Parcel Map ~7 filed by City of Santa Ana creating four parcels on west side of King at 10th be approved subject to conditions in Planning Director's report dated February 2, 1966. TE~T. PARCEL MAP 448 It was moved by Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, that Tentative Parcel Map ~8 filed by Income Centers, Inc., et al., creating two parcels on Wainut, Center, Chestnut and Daisy Streets be approved subject to conditions in Planning Director's report dated February 2, 1966 and that w~iver of alley requirement be approved. TENT. PARCEL MAP 446 It was moved by Councilman Gilmore, seconded by Councilman Herrin and carried, that Tentative Parcel Map 446 filed by Philip R. Leos creating two parcels on the north side of Roosevelt, west of Euclid, be approved subject to conditions in Planning Director's report dated January 19, 1966. CITY COUNCIL - 458 - February 7, 1966