Laserfiche WebLink
a policy which would refer this problem to aa adwisory board or body who <br />woul~ give Council the benefit of a considerable a~ouut of time° The <br />City Manager expressed the opinion that he did not think it would be <br />fair to ask the B~ar~ to take ou a technical analysis of a highly compli- <br />cated area. <br /> <br />Cotmcilman Burk suggeste~ ~ro Gilmore present a vritten recommendation <br />to the City Council as to the areas where he believes the Personnel <br />Board cs~ be more effective, without overriding the Charter. <br /> <br />Mr. Ralph de Sim~ue, representi~ the Santa A~a E~pleyees Association, <br />expressed approval of the recommendations presente~l by the City )~anager. <br /> <br />Councilman' Markel suggested the wages be a~Justed to the cost of living. <br />Councilman Burk ex~ressed coacer~ about the role of the Police Officer, <br />stat~E he thOUght this was aa area where the City has the most diffi~ <br />culty in~ obtai~-~ qualified people, and reco~eucle~ c~sideration of <br />an a~lditic~al increase in the Police classifications. The City ~anager <br />stated ~ta A~'s wa~e seheclule w~s amo~ the top six or seven citie~ <br />in the State. Councilman Gilmore's opinion was that this illustrated <br />the necessity for further stu~ by the Personnel Boar~ as it is a <br />Basic policy Ju~ent which will have to be decided, l~or ~arvey su~- <br />geuted Councilman Gilmore bring to Council in ~itin~ a reccaaaen~ation <br />to cove~ working with the Personnel B~ard regarding a study and involve- <br />~e~t of the Boa~i within 30 ~s~s. C~Ancil~n NcMichael cc~,~ented <br />re~ the Manager's salar~ which has not been reviewed for two <br />years; ~l~ayor Harvey s~ggested a discussion be held in Executive Session <br />at nex~ Council M~eting. <br /> <br />l~c was moved ~y Councilman Brooks, seconded by C~ucil~a~ ~Lrk, that <br />further reading be waived, and RESOIJJ?I~N 66-127 AMEND~ SECTIONS 3 <br />AND ~1 OF RESOLUtiON 55-281 be a~opte~ as corrected. O~ roll call Vc~e: <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />A~SE~T: <br /> <br />Councilmen Gilmore, Brooks, Burk, F~rvey <br />Councilmen ~arkel, Mcl(ichael <br />Counctl~a- Nerrin <br /> <br />ltE~OI~TION 66-128 CASE <br /> <br />~s mo,~d by Comncilman ~ilmore, <br />farther rea4iug be waived and Resolution 66-128 be adopted. <br />call vote: <br /> <br /> RESOLUTIO~ ~-128 ACCEPTING D~:~,~S <br /> ~g T~: CIT~ IS PAYING A CASH <br /> COI~ID~ATION (Za~ora, Licerlo, <br /> ~Aintana) was read by title. It <br />se¢onde~ by Councilman Marksl t~at <br /> On roll <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Cmmcilmen Gilmore, ~r~ks, B~rk, ~arvey, ~ksl~ <br /> ~cl~lcJmael <br />Councilmen None <br />Council~m Nerrin <br /> <br />I~ESOLUTION 66-129 W5 ~,,~ RESOLFTION 66-129 A~HORIZI~ <br />QU~ D~ ~,~' ~I~ OF A Q~ D~ <br /> J ~ 0F ~0~ ~s read ~ title~ <br /> It ~s m~ed by Co~ci~n Gi~ore, <br />seco~e~ by Co~ci~ ~r~el~ that ~her re~ ~ waived ~d Reso- <br />lutio~ ~-~9 be adopted. ~ roll call <br /> <br />CI'~ CO~CIL -2~- <br /> <br />September 6, 1966 <br /> <br /> <br />