11-06-1967 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

VACATION Electric right of way. Hearing was opened on the proposed abandonment of a por~iom of Alton Street between Talber~ and the Pacific The Clerk reported Notice of Nearing published an~ posted wi~h evidence on file, and that a c~ication ~ been recei~ Districts req~at~g that the ent~ p~ien of Altom Street Be~ ~cateA, ~her t~ ~e ~ f~ s~rip pr~osed ~ the ~s~lu~i~, Be rose.ed as a sewer eas~ent for both ~he ~ls~ a~ propose~ facilities ~d ~ha~ the act~l eas~ent reser~ticn be ~ a f~ satisfacto~ te the Distri~. On motion of Councilman Thurmam, sec~mded by Councilman Markel amd carried, the City Attorney was instructed te prepare a new l~eselution of Iutention, with sewer easement of i~-,ll width reserved, for adoption at next Council meet'~ng o APPEAL 197 ca e~5 l~earin~ ~as opened on am appeal filed VARIANCE 67-81 by Voit Rabbet Corporation appealing Condition 7 requiring full width sidewalk en Harbor Blvd. and Sunflower Awe. in Zoning Administrator's approval of VA 67-51 to provide less than the required number of parking spaces at 3501 S. Harbor Blvd. in the M 1 Di~striC~o ~ae Clerk reperte~ motice of the hearing mailed to adjacent proper~y owners on October 26 with evidence on file ama ne comaunicntions received° John Martin, 2725 Via Montezuma~ San Clemente, representing Voit ~uhBer Corp., stated that there are no sidewalks in the area at this time, and that the ccmpany would be willing to install sidewalks when pedestriam traffic warramts it amd when they develop fum~her an~ have adjoining busines sos. On mo~ion of Councituan Brooks, seconde~ by Councilman 14arkel amd carrie~, the City Attorney was instrncted to prepare a resolution grauting the appeal and changing Condition 7 so that sidewalks shall be constrmcted whom adjacent property is developed or at the end of five years; an~ to prepare am agreement for the sidewalk construction to he presented co~- currently with the resolution. APPEAL 1~ (~f~ ~'5 Heariug was epemed en appeal filed by VARIANCE 67-85 O~to Ac Nansen fr~m Zoning A~uimistrater's demigl cf VA 67-55 to permit a porch addition to encroach into the required front yard at 2~16 N. ~ush in the R 2 District. The Clerk reported no, ice of hearing mailed with evidence on file and no ceanaunications filed. Mrs. Nansen explained the awning is already installed an~. they though~ permit was valid. Noone else desiring to speak~ the hearin~ was closed. It was moved, by Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman Griset~ that Council overrule the action of the Zoning Administrator an~ instruct the City Attorney te prepare a resolution granting Variance 67-8~o In response to a question of the Planning Director, it was noted by Councilman Brooks that it was the intent to grant relief in this par~i2ular instance only$ that the Council would not con~one pernits ClT~ CO~CIL 319 November 6, 1967