My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1968
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1968
>
10-21-1968
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:01:09 PM
Creation date
4/28/2003 3:38:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/21/1968
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RES. 68-166 - CONDEMNATION RESOLUTION 68-166 AUTHORIZING <br /> CONDEMNATION OF A PARCEL OF REAL <br /> PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST <br />CORNER OF MAIN AND SEVENTEENTH STREETS FOR STREET PURPOSES was <br />adopted after reading, on motion of Councilman Brooks, seconded by Councilman <br />Markel. <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Herrin, Brooks, Carlson, Griset, Markel, McMichael <br />None <br />Thurman <br /> <br />RES. 68-167 -ABATING ua ~ RESOLUTION 68-167 AUTHORIZING THE <br />NUISANCE CITY ATTORNEY TO ABATE A PUBLIC <br /> NUISANCE. EXISTING UPON A PUBLIC <br />RIGHT OF WAY was adopted after reading, on motion of Councilman Brooks, <br />seconded by Councilman Griset. <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Herrin, Brooks, Carlson, Griset, Markel, McMichael <br />None <br />Thurman <br /> <br />TAXI APPLICATION c,~ ~ Petition for Re-Hearing of U. T. O. · Inc., <br /> requesting Council to order a re-hearing <br /> on Application for Certificate of Public <br />Convenience and Necessity to operate ten taxicabs in the City was considered <br />by the City Council. Robert Politiski, attorney representing U. T. O., Inc., <br />explained to Council that his client felt enough evidence had been given for <br />the need of more taxicabs in the City since the application had been denied that <br />they were in a position to ask for a re-hearing on the original application. The <br />City Attorney explained to the Council that the previous application filed by <br />U. T. O., Inc. is a closed affair and suggested that if a re -examination is sought, <br />a new application should be filed. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Councilman Brooks to deny the request for a re-hearing, <br />which motion was lost for lack of a second. <br /> <br />After further discussion by Council, on motion of Councilman Griset, seconded <br />by Councilman Herrin and carried, the Petition for Re-Hearing was ordered <br />filed. Councilman Brooks voted "No". <br /> <br />NEWPORT BEACH C,~1 Two City of Newport Beach Resolutions <br />RESOLUTIONS regarding Proposition 7 and regarding <br /> Proposition lA on the November ballot <br />were ordered filed, on motion of Councilman Carlson, seconded by Councilman <br />Herrin and carried. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />October 21, :I968 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.