My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 2100 W. Alton Ave.-YMCA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
01/20/2004
>
31A - 2100 W. Alton Ave.-YMCA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:03:17 PM
Creation date
1/16/2004 3:18:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
1/20/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Substantially degrade the existing visual characte~'"or <br /> quality of the site and it's surrounding? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The General Plan Urban Design Element identifies that the <br />project site is located within the Armstrong Design District. <br />The Urban Design Element establishes goals and policies to help <br />guide the design of land uses proposed within a Design District. <br />Specifically, land uses proposed within a Design District should <br />exhibit high quality design and should incorporate design <br />elements that are proportional and aesthetically related to the <br />District setting. <br /> <br />Additionally, the proposed project would be subject to the <br />design standards established in the SD-4 Zoning Document. The <br />SD-4 design guidelines establish a framework to maintain design <br />consistency between the ultimate development pattern of <br />Armstrong Ranch and individual development projects. <br /> <br />Through the City's development review process, the proposed <br />project was determined to be consistent with the City's Urban <br />Design Element and the SD-4 design guidelines. Compliance with <br />the Urban Design Element and the SD-4 design guidelines would <br />reduce potential aesthetics impacts to a level considered less <br />than significant. Therefore, implementation of the proposed <br />project would not degrease the existing visual character of the <br />project site or surrounding project area. <br /> <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which <br /> would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? <br /> <br />Less Than Si~nificant Impact <br /> <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not introduce <br />substantial amounts of new sources of light and glare into the <br />project area. Any lighting provided on the project site would be <br />designed and located so that all direct rays are confined to the <br />project site. <br /> <br />I. AGRICULTURE <br /> <br />A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farm/and or Farmland of <br /> Statewide Importance to non-agriculture use? <br />B. Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use or a <br /> williamson Contract? <br /> <br />31.A. <br /> <br />~age 5 of 45.n,~ <br /> ge <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.