Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Doe. the project have impact. that are individually limited <br />but cumulativelY considerable? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD-60 would not result in <br />any significant cumulative impacts. in that the proposed project <br />dòes not of involve any land use changes or changes in land use <br />intensities that would increase cumulative impacts within the <br />SD-60 project area. ' <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Does the project have environmental effect., which will <br />cause substantial adverse effect. on human being. either <br />directly or indirectly? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to SD~60 would not directly <br />cause any substantial adverse effects on human beings in that <br />the proposed project would not involve any activities that would <br />cause adverse impacts on human beings. . <br /> <br />XVIII. DBTBRKINATION <br /> <br />Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented <br />in the above evaluation and cited references, I find that the <br />proposed project would not have a significant impact on the <br />environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. <br /> <br />XVIV. REFERENCBS <br /> <br />city of Santa Ana General Plan September 1982 <br /> <br />Environmental Impact report for the General Plan Land Use <br />Element, August 1997 <br /> <br />City of Santa Ana zoning Ordinance, December 1998 <br /> <br />California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines <br /> <br />Site visit July 2003 by Dan Bott <br /> <br />California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity data <br />Base <br /> <br />South Coast Air Quality Management Plan <br /> <br />EXHffiIT 2 <br />17 <br />19D-21 <br />