Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.1 <br />II I <br />, I <br /> <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> <br />Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />A brief eXplanation Is required for e 1 answers except .No Impacf' answers that are adequately supported <br />by the Information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" <br />answer Is adequately supported If the referenced information sources show that the Impact simply does <br />not apply to projects like the one Involved (e.g., ths project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A .No <br />Impacr answer should be explained where It Is based on project-specific factors as well as general <br />standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-speclfic <br />screening analysis). ' <br /> <br />All enswers must take eccount of the whole ectlon invOlved, including off-site as wall as on-site, <br />cumulative as well as project-level, Indirect as well as direct, and CO/UIlruction as well as operational <br />Impacts. <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />III. <br /> <br />"Potentially Significant Impact" Is appropriate If there Is subs ¡¡ntlal evidence that an effect Is significant If <br />there are one or more .Potentlally Slgnlficantlmpecf' entries when the determlnetlon 18 made, an EIR Is <br />required. <br /> <br />"Potentially Significant Unless MItigation Incorporated" applies where the Incorporation of mltlgatio!1 <br />measures has reduced an effect from .Potentially Significant Impact" to a .Less than Significant Impact". <br />The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce ths effect to <br />a less than significant level. <br /> <br />rI. <br /> <br /> PotentIally <br /> Slgnlftcant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Slgnlftcant Mltlgelion Slgnlflcant No <br />Illu.. & Supporting information 8ouI'CU IlÍ1p8cf IlICOl )Ot3ted Impact Impact <br />I. Aesthetics - Would the project: <br /> A. Heve a subslanlisl adverse effect on a scenic vIsta? 0 0 0 ~ <br /> 'B. ,Damage acenlc resources. Including but not limited 0 0 0 M <br /> to. treas, rocl< outpourings end historic buDdlngs <br /> within a state highway? <br /> C. Substantially degrade ths existing visual character ~ <br /> or quality of the site end Its surroundings? 0 0 0 <br /> D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br /> which would edversely affect day or nlgtlttlme views 0 0 0 9\ <br /> In the area? <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />20 <br />190-24 <br /> <br />Pag.1of10 <br /> <br />md\mswonI\anYCheck.doc\ 1.1 "89 <br /> <br />'-' <br />