Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />I.2!!n§ <br /> <br />The cash flow projects potential cash deficits, as discussed above. The deficits are <br />primarily the result of sssumed on-golng ERAF payments to the State as a result of State <br />budget deficits, The cash flow assumes that short-tenn loans can be advanced to the <br />Agency, as necessary, to meet any Mure year deficits. The projection assumes that the <br />Agency may borrow from the Housing Fund In order to meet the ERAF payments. Non- <br />ERAF deficits are assumed to be funded from othar Agency financing sources. Loan <br />principal and Interest (assumed at 6%) to be paid, on a pay-as-you-go basis, within the <br />subsequent fiscal years. The short-tenn loans may be funded from any allowable source <br />outlined above. ' <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />PROPOSED FINANCING METHOD, ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY, AND <br />REASONS FOR INCLUDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The anticipated costs to Implemant a program of revitalization In the Merged Project Aree <br />will require significant partlcipetion from the Agency as It Implements activities that promote <br />and achieve the stated goals snd objectives of the Amended Plan. Economic feasibility of <br />the Merged Project Area has been determined based upon a comparative cash flow <br />analysis of the anticipated costs for Implementation of the proposed redevelopment <br />program to the resulting projected resources expected to be generated over the life of the <br />Merged Project Area. <br /> <br />The financial fessibillty cash flow summarized on Table 4 was created to represent one <br />scanario of economic feasJblllty, M the discretion of the Agency, other funding sources <br />discussed ebove may also represent viable funding altematlves for economic feasibility of <br />the Amended Plan. Although the Agency may consider other funding sources pennltted In <br />the Amended Plan, not all of the funding sources may be available or be feasible for the <br />Agency to use In financing the antlclpsted costs and revenue shortfalls. In the event that <br />neither the City nor the private markat acting alone could fully bear the costs associated <br />with revitellzatlon of the Merged Project Area, the implementation of a redevelopment <br />program utilizing tax Increment revenues must be considered as a viable financing tool. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Preliminary Report for the Me<ger of 111. <br />Santa Ana Redevelopment Projects <br /> <br />JSXIf,I.l:U:I.' ¡¡: <br /> <br />Keyser Marston Asacciates, Inc. <br />Page 21 <br /> <br />'-"""'CI<oOd <br />,-.-... <br /> <br />55C-39 <br />