My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
A-1997-025 - Waste Disposal Services
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
O
>
ORANGE, COUNTY OF
>
A-1997-025 - Waste Disposal Services
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2020 8:41:30 AM
Creation date
5/24/2004 10:01:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
County of Orange
Contract #
A-1997-025
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
3/3/1997
Expiration Date
6/30/2010
Destruction Year
2015
Notes
Amended by A-2004-095
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE IV <br />CONTRACT RATE <br />SECTION 4.1. CHARGING AND SECURING PAYMENT OF CONTRACT RATE. The City <br />acknowledges that the County shall have the right to charge and collect a Contract Rate for the acceptance and <br />disposal of Controllable Waste delivered to the System by any Franchise Hauler. The Contract Rate shall be <br />calculated and established, and may be modified, as provided in Section 4.2 hereof In addition, the City <br />acknowledges that the County shall have the right to establish as part of the operating rules and regulations <br />reasonable measures to secure the payment of all Contract Rates. <br />SECTION 4.2. Contract Rate. (A) Initial Term. Effective July 1, 1997, the Contract Rate <br />payable by each Franchise Hauler shall be $22.00 per ton, contingent on the delivery to the Disposal System of <br />an amount of Acceptable Waste at least equal to the Cumulative Tonnage Targets identified in Appendix 2, and <br />subject to potential adjustment necessary to reflect the circumstances set forth below: <br />(i) increased costs incurred by the County (in excess of available insurance proceeds) due <br />to the occurrence of one or more Uncontrollable Circumstances, including Changes in Law; <br />(ii) average annual inflation at any point during the Term of this Agreement in excess of <br />four per cent, compounded annually, calculated in accordance with Section 4.2 (F), <br />(iii) costs incurred by the County (in excess of available insurance proceeds and amounts <br />available in the Environmental Fund for such purposes) remediating environmental conditions at the <br />Disposal System or inactive or closed disposal sites in the County, which, if uncorrected, could give rise <br />to potential claims under CERCLA or related federal or state statutes, including costs incurred providing <br />indemnification to any Participating City pursuant to subsection 7.3 (but not including costs of obtaining <br />insurance pursuant to Section 3.3(F)); or <br />(iv) tonnage shortfalls to the extent permitted by Sections 4.2(B) and 4.2(C). <br />Prior to adjusting the Contract Rate as a result of any of the circumstances described above, the County shall <br />utilize the following remedies in the following order of priority: <br />(i) reduce the costs of operating the Disposal System to the extent practicable; <br />(ii) utilize Excess Import Revenues to pay costs of the Disposal System; and <br />(iii) utilize Unrestricted Reserves to pay costs of the Disposal System. <br />Any adjustments to the Contract Rate permitted by this Section shall be calculated by the County to reflect the <br />actual costs or expenses of addressing the circumstance or circumstances pursuant to which the adjustment is <br />authorized. <br />(B) County Acceptable Waste Shortfall. In the event that the actual amount of County <br />Acceptable Waste delivered to the Disposal System at the end of any Contract Year is less than the Cumulative <br />Tonnage Target for such Contract Year for County Acceptable Waste, as specified in Appendix 2, the County <br />shall utilize the following options, in the following order of priority, in order to remedy any adverse effects of <br />such tonnage shortfall: <br />(i) reduce the costs of operating the Disposal System to the extent practicable; <br />Execution Copy 19 (Revised Page) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.