Laserfiche WebLink
<br />building. These design elements would include façade <br />improvements, new windows, roof repairs and additional <br />landscaping. Through the City's development review process <br />the proposed project has been determined to be consistent <br />with the intent of the City's Urban Design Element. <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not degrade <br />the existing visual character of the project site or the <br />surrounding area. <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Create a new source <br />which would adversely <br />the area? <br /> <br />of substantial light or glare, <br />affect day or nighttime views in <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The project site is currently improved with existing on- <br />street lighting. Implementation of the proposed project <br />would not introduce substantial new sources of light and <br />glare into the project area. <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />AGRICULTURE <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of <br />Statewide Importance to non-agriculture use? <br />Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use or a <br />Williamson Contract? <br />Involve other changes in the existing environment, <br />which, due to their location or nature, could <br />individually or cumulatively result in loss of <br />Farmland, to non-agriculture use? <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the California Department of Conservation <br />Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the project site <br />does not contain Unique Farmlands, Prime Farmlands or <br />Farmlands of Statewide Importance. Based on the City's <br />General Plan, the project site is not planned for <br />agricultural uses. Additionally, the project site is not <br />included within any existing Williamson Contracts. A site <br />visit conducted by the City's Environmental Coordinator <br />confirmed the project site is currently not in agriculture <br />production. Therefore, implementation of the proposed <br />project would not result in adverse impacts to any <br />agriculture resources. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />31 Âg~2~9 <br />