My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 1901 N. TUSTIN AVENUE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
06/07/2004
>
31A - 1901 N. TUSTIN AVENUE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:02:26 PM
Creation date
6/7/2004 4:17:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
6/7/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />æmSANTA <br />ANA . <br /> <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> <br />Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported <br />by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impacf <br />answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does <br />not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No <br />Impacf' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general <br />standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific <br />screening analysis). <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, <br />cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational <br />impacts. <br /> <br />III. <br /> <br />"Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If <br />there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is <br />required. <br /> <br />IV. <br /> <br />"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation <br />measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact". <br />The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to <br />a less than significant level. <br /> <br /> Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />I. Aesthetics - Would the project: <br /> A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 j¿{ <br /> B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited 0 0 0 A <br /> to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings <br /> within a state highway? <br /> C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character A <br /> or quality of the site and its surroundings? 0 0 0 <br /> D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br /> which would adversely affect day or nighttime views >¥ <br /> in the area? 0 0 0 <br /> <br />md\msword\envcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 <br /> <br />Page 1 of 10 <br /> <br />31Ä~~5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.