Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />"CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br /> <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br /> <br />JUNE 21, 2004 <br /> <br />TITLE: <br />PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL NO. 2004-05 <br />FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 121 SOUTH <br />BIRCH STREET, UNITS 1-8 ON THE SANTA <br />ANA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL PROPERTIES <br /> <br /> <br />;anG~ <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER <br /> <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />D As Recommended <br />D As Amended <br />D Ordinance on 1s1 Reading <br />D Ordinance on 2,d Reading <br />D Implementing Resolution <br />D Set Public Hearing For <br /> <br />CONTINUED TO <br /> <br />FILE NUMBER <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Deny Appeal No. 2004-05. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Adopt a resolution approving <br />Application No. 2004-23. <br /> <br />Historic <br /> <br />Resources <br /> <br />Commission <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />Adopt a resolution approving Historic Register Categorization No. <br />2004-23. <br /> <br />HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />Adopted a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application <br />No. 2004-23 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2004-23 at its April <br />1, 2004 meeting by a vote of 8:0 (Chinn absent). <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Request of Applicant <br /> <br />Mrs. Rose Palmer of Palmer Enterprises, the owner of the Kaiser <br />Apartments, is appealing the placement and categorization of this <br />structure on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Historic <br />Resources Commission Application No. 2004-23 and Historic Register <br />Categorization No. 2004-23). Mrs. Palmer submitted a letter of appeal <br />(Exhibit 1) on April 12, 2004 stating her reasons for declining the <br />register listing. The request to appeal the Historic Resources <br />Commission decision is based on: 1) the opinion that the structure is not <br />of great historical significance, 2) the structure is a multiple family <br />residence, 3) proximity to "non-historic" commercial businesses, 4) <br />Mimitations to redevelop the property in conjunction with the First <br />..,treet and Broadway corridor, and 5) concerns with potential limitations <br />on future selling price (Exhibit 1). <br /> <br />75A-1 <br />