02-02-1970 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT APPLICATION 652 APRICOT DEVELOPMENT CO. (continued) hearing that portion of the area which is R 4 zoned property lying to the east of the CR cross section on the map and that Council consider only that portion lying westerly of the CR section, presently zoned R 1, and that the portion to be excluded from the hearing tonight be held for further hearing at such time as the Apricot Development Company should request it. The City Manager explained that if the area is to be rezoned, it would be in the City's best interests if it were under the control of a single owner, and that while Mr. Bueche and his company have option control of the whole area, they do not have sufficient control to go forward with a planned development. Mr. Frank Bueche confirmed the City Manager's explanation of the request. The Mayor opened the hearing on Amendment Application 652, filed by Apricot Development Company, proposing amendment of Sectional District Map 36-5-10 by reclassifying from the IK 1 and IK 4 Districts to the CR District property located on the north side of MacArthur between Ramona Drive and Bristol Street. There being no response to the call for testimony, the hearing was closed. In response to a question by Councilman Evans, the City Attorney stated that the Council could act ~n the request and that if a referral to the Planning Commission was necessary, he would report back to the Council and to Mr. Bueche, so that both would be aware of it. On motion of Councilman Herr]n, seconded by Councilman Patterson, Council approved the reclassification of the smaller portion shown on the map from the R 1 District to the Ci~ District on Amendment Application 652, instructed the City Attorney to prepare the amending ordinance, and held in abeyance consideration of the larger portion (R 4) until the Council meeting of March 2, 1970, on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Herr]n, Evans, Markel, Patterson, Villa, Yamamoto, Griset None None PUBLIC HEARING Appeal No. 228 was filed by James F. APPEAL NO. 228 - VA 69-86 and Mary C. Henry, appealing the MORGAN Planning Commission's approval of Variance Application 69-86 granted to Marshal]. L. Morgan to construct a two story garden apartment complex in the A 1 District at 727 South Lyon Street. On January 5 Council upheld the PlannSng Commission's decision in granting the Variance and denied the appeal. On January 19 Council acted to reconsider its action taken on January 5 and set the matter for rehearing on this date. The City Attorney explained to Council that he had held a conference in his office on this date with Mr. Morgan and his representative and certain members of staff, and that Mr. Morgan had been requested to attempt to bring in a plot plan for this evening's hearing that would show that the apartment complex and the F]omar's Kennels could exist compatibly next door to each other. CITY COUNCIL -34- February 2, 1970