Laserfiche WebLink
RECESS <br /> <br />Council members present. <br /> <br />At 10:00 P.M., a five minute recess <br />was declared. The Council recon- <br />vened at 10:10 P. M., with the same <br /> <br />REIMBURSEMENTS <br /> <br />ized reimbursement for the following: <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Patterson, <br />seconded by Councilman Villa and <br />unanimously carried, Council author- <br /> <br />First Assembly of God Church for street improvements <br />on Santa Clara at south west corner of Wright, in the <br />amount of $5,341.71. <br /> <br />First Mexican Baptist Church, for improvements on south <br />side of Hazard east of Euclid, in the amount of $1,400. <br /> <br />National Land Development Company for improvements <br />on north side of Seventeenth, Mabury Street to Sherry <br />Lane, in the amount of $871.57. <br /> <br />Macco Corporation for improvements on (A) north side <br />of Sunflower 800 feet west of Main Street, in the amount <br />of $203. 52; (B) northwest corner of Main Street and <br />MacArthur Boulevard, in the amount of $647. 13; (C) <br />north side of MacArthur Boulevard from 200 feet to 574 <br />feet west of Main Street, also west side of Main from <br />200 feet north of MacArthur to 230 feet north of Columbine, <br />in the amount of $2,454.96; total reimbursement in the <br />amount of $3,305.61. <br /> <br />ORAL COMMUNICATIONS <br /> <br />FEDERAL RENT SUPPLEMENT Kevin O'Mahony, 1026 North Elaine <br />PROGRAM Drive, read and presented to the City <br /> Council a petition containing approxi- <br />mately 856 signatures of property owners and registered voters of Ward 7 <br />and adjoining areas of the City, requesting Council to review Resolution 70-9, <br />Approving Participation by Local Housing Owners in the Federal Rent Supple- <br />ment Program, adopted on February 16 1970. <br /> <br />He stated that residents of the area proposed for the low-income apartment <br />development had received no notice concerning the Council's intention to <br />adopt Resolution 70-9; that it had come to their attention because the developer <br />had filed an application for a variance which was set for hearing by the Planning <br />Commission on March 9; that during that hearing, his group had requested <br />the Commission to defer action for 30 days, which request had been granted. <br /> <br />In response to a request by the Vice Mayor for a ruling on the matter, the <br />City Attorney stated that a motion to reconsider an action can only be taken <br />at the same meeting or at the meeting following that at which the action had <br />been taken, but that a resolution could be rescinded. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -76- March 16, 1970 <br /> <br /> <br />