06-01-1970 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORD. NS-1020 ANIMAL CONTROL - (Continued) The following persons spoke in opposition to the hobby kennel provisions of the ordinance: Mrs. William Owen, 2016 W. 15th Street, who presented a petition containing approximately 30 signatures of persons opposed to the hobby kennel provisions, which petition was ordered filed, on motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Herrin and unanimously carried; Beuford Gibson, 12962 Browning Avenue, representing the Santa Ana-Orange-Tustin Board of Realtors; J.G. Rollo, 1318 S. Poplar; Charles Swanner, 2346 N. Park Boulevard, who felt hobby kennels should be only on a variance application. The following persons spoke in support of the ordinance: Mary Henry, 921 S. Lyon; Freda Sathre, 846 E. Normandy; Mrs. Dolores Perez, 9762 13th Street; Mrs. Edith Izant, 8311 La Sierra, Whittier, of the California Dog Fanciers' Association; Mary Rogers, 13161 Sanders Place; Diane Harr, 2370 N. Flower. Council discussed the possibility of requiring a variance or use permit for hobby kennels to protect neighboring property values, or some type of permit. After further discussion, it was moved by Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Villa, to adopt Ordinance NS-1020 as presented at this meeting. The motion failed adoption on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Villa Herrin, Evans, Markel, Yamamoto, None Griset It was then moved by Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Villa, to pass to second reading Ordinance NS-1020 with the modification in Section 5-13 (c) that hobby kennels shall be a distance of at least 25 feet from any dwelling other than the owner's dwelling. The motion failed adoption on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Villa Herrin, Evans, Markel, Yamamoto, Griset None After a motion by Councilman Markel to continue the matter to July 6 died for lack of a second, it was moved by Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, that Ordinance NS-1020 be passed to second reading with the amendment that all reference to hobby kennels be deleted from the ordinance. The motion was adopted on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Herrin, Evans, Markel, Yamamoto, Griset Patterson, Villa None On motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Markel and unanimously carried, the staff was instructed to submit a report to Council recommending an alternative method that would allow dog fanciers to possess between three and five dogs. CITY COUNCIL -153- June l, 1970