My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 1710-1730 E. 17TH ST.
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
07/19/2004
>
31A - 1710-1730 E. 17TH ST.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:39 PM
Creation date
7/22/2004 4:06:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
7/19/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~'K <br /> <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> <br />-_._------,-" --- - -------- <br /> <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of <br />the site or area, including through the alteration of <br />the course of stream or river, or substantially <br />increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a <br />manner which would result in flooding on or off- <br />site? <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Create or contribute runoff water which would <br />exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial <br />additional sources of polluted run-off? <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as <br />mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br />Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation map? <br /> <br />F. <br /> <br />Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which <br />would impede or redirect flood flows? <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as <br />mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or <br />Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard <br />delineation map? <br /> <br />IX. Land Use and Planning- Would the project: <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Physically divide an established community? <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, <br />or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over <br />the project (including, but not limited to the general <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan <br />or natural community conservation plan? <br /> <br />X. Mineral Resources - Would the project: <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Result in the loss of availability of a locally- <br />Important mineral resource recovery site <br />delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or <br />other land use plan? <br /> <br />mdlmswordlenvcheck.doc\ 1.15.99 <br /> <br />3T~~~b <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br /> <br />tzt <br /> <br />ç¥ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />M <br />~ <br /> <br />$ <br />~ <br /> <br />Øf <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.