My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - GP AMEND H20 QUALITY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
07/19/2004
>
75D - GP AMEND H20 QUALITY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
7/22/2004 4:23:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75D
Date
7/19/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />""fA <br /> <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> <br />M. <br /> <br />Create a significant adverse environmental impact <br />to drainage pattems due to changes in runoff flow <br />rates or volumes? <br /> <br />N. <br /> <br />Tributary to an already impaired water body, as <br />listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list: If <br />so, can it result in an increase in any pollutant of <br />which the water body is already impaired? <br /> <br />o. <br /> <br />Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? <br />If so, can it exacerbate already existing sensitive <br />conditions? <br /> <br />P. <br /> <br />Have a potentially significant environmental impact <br />on surface water quality to either marine, fresh, or <br />wetland waters? <br /> <br />Q. <br /> <br />Have a potentially significant adverse impact on <br />groundwater quality? <br /> <br />R. <br /> <br />Cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable <br />surface or groundwater receiving water quality <br />objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? <br /> <br />s. <br /> <br />Impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian habitat? <br /> <br />IX. Land Use and Planning- Would the project: <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Physically divide an established community? <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, <br />or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over <br />the project (including, but not limited to the general <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan <br />or natural community conservation plan? <br /> <br />X. Mineral Resources - Would the project: <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Result in the loss of availability of a locally <br />important mineral resource recovery site delineated <br />on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land <br />use plan? <br /> <br />ISSUGS & Supporting Information SourcGs <br />dblEnv Form CECA Chklst <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT B <br />~61)J;42 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />0 <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />D <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />ß( <br /> <br />)?( <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />]¿( <br />D <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.