My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-04-1971
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1971
>
01-04-1971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:26 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 9:36:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/4/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RES. 71-4 RESOLUTION 71-4 AMENDING <br />PLAN EXAMINER SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION <br /> NO. 58-281 TO REVISE SALARY <br />ALLOCATION OF PLAN EXAlV[INER and the Plan Examiner Classification <br />description were unanimously approved on motion of Councilman Patterson, <br />seconded by Councilman Villa. <br /> <br />RES. 71-5 RESOLUTLON 71-5 A-~ENDING <br />SUPERVISOR OF INSPECTIONS SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION <br /> NO. 58-281 TO ADD CLASS <br />TITLE OF SUPERVISOR OF INSPE]CTIONS and the Supervisor of Inspections <br />Classification description were unanimously approved on motion of Councilman <br />Patterson, seconded by Councilman Villa. <br /> <br />* ORD. NS-1060 CoUncilman Yamamoto's motion, <br />WARD BOUNDARY LINES seconded by CoUncilman Markel, <br />REMOVED FROM TABLE to adopt Ordinance NS-1060, <br /> tabled earlier in the meeting <br /> (refer to page Z)~~ was removed from the table and discussion was had on the <br /> motion. <br /> <br />Councilman Evans asked the City Attorney for a legal interpretation of Section <br />101.2 which describes the circumstances governing ward boundary changes and <br />whether or not any ward boundary could be legally altered if it did not vary <br />more than 10% in voter registration from any other ward, <br /> <br />The City Attorney responded that it is a matter of interpretation; that a 10 <br />percent variation in one ward necessitating adjustment could affect every other <br />ward boundary, thereby changing them all; and that. in his opinion, it would <br />be legally correct under the provisions of the Charter. <br /> <br />Mrs. Janice Boer, 912 E. Lowell, stated that the Charter provides that the <br />only ward boundary which shall be changed is the one wherein more than 10 <br />percent voter registration difference is present; and that the other boundaries <br />should not be altered because of the considerable number of voters that could <br />then be relocated in a different ward. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council that the realignment of the ward boundaries <br />should be accomplished with the minimum transfer of voters from their present <br />ward to another. <br /> <br />The motion to approve Ordinance NS-1060 carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Herrin, Markel, Patterson, Villa, Yamamoto, Griset <br />Evans <br />None <br /> <br />Councilman Evans' motion, seconded by Councilman Patterson, to refer <br />Section 101. Z of the City Charter to the City Attorney and City Manager to draft <br />a policy recommendation for the Council's consideration which would, in the <br />future, govern the staff in its procedure for realignment of the ward boundaries <br /> <br /> CITY COUNCIL - aI0- January 4, 1971 <br /> <br />* This Minute entry was amended. See Council Minutes for January 18, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.