My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-04-1971
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1971
>
01-04-1971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:26 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 9:36:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/4/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing to consider <br />APPEAL 252, EX 70-13 appeal 252, filed by Kenneth L. <br /> and Freta M. Edwards, from <br />the Zoning Administrator's denial of Minor Exception 70-13, to allow less <br />than the required distance between a single family residence and a garage <br />in the R 1 District at 1901 South GarnseyStreet, was opened by the Mayor. <br /> <br />The Clerk reported that no written communication s had been received on the <br />matter. <br /> <br />Proponents: Gerald Orman, 3012 West lqelger Avenue, representing <br /> the applicant; John Oatly. <br /> <br />Mr. Orman distributed pictures of the subject property to the Council. He <br />stated that the applicant has now sold the home and is presently in escrow; <br />that the addition to the home was built without having obtained a building <br />permit; that this had resulted in the ~zoning violation but ~laat inspections of <br />the addition after it had been constructed indicated it had been built in <br />compllance with the Building Code and the Building Department had approved <br />the addition. <br /> <br />Mr. Oatly stated that the neighbors approved of the addition to the home and <br />did not believe it was detrimental to the neighborhood. Members of the City <br />Building staff stated that there was no evidence of an application for a <br />Building Permit having been filed prior to the construction and no evidence of <br />inspections made during the construction; and that the owner was advised that <br />the distance between the buildings did not satisfy the Code requirement when <br />the first inspection was made on the finished structure. <br /> <br />There were no opponents and the hearing was closed by the Mayor. <br /> <br />Councilman Markel's motion, seconded by Councilman Villa, to grant the <br />appeal and overrule the Zoning Administrator's decision failed to carry on <br />the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Markel, Villa <br />Herrin, Evans, Patterson, Yamamoto, Griset <br />None <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, to <br />deny the appeal; uphold the Zoning Administrator's decision; and instruct <br />the City Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution was approved on the <br />following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Herrin, Evans, Pattersb~%, Yamamoto, Griset <br />Markel, Villa <br />None <br /> <br />I{ECESS <br /> <br />present. <br /> <br />At 8:55 P, lVio, a five minute recess <br />was declared. The Council reconvened <br />at 9:00 P.M., with all members <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />January 4, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.