My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-01-1971
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1971
>
02-01-1971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:33 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 9:40:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/1/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RES. 71-19 <br />SPECIAL ELECTION - (Continued) <br /> <br />Preceding the vote on the above motion, a substitute motion proposed by <br />Councilman Herrin to delete from Proposition B the expenditure which <br />would be involved in the bond election to develop the park property <br />acquired by the money which would be raised by the bond sales, died <br />for lack of a second. <br /> <br />RES. 71-20 RESOLUTION 71-20~OF. <br />SPECIAL ELECTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br /> THE CITY OF SANTA A/NA, <br />CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE <br />WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES was presented. Mayor <br />Griset requested that each member of the Council participate in arguments <br />either in favor of or opposed to Propositions A and B. Mrs. Janice Boer, <br />91Z N. Lowell, Santa Aha, spoke in opposition to the Council appointing <br />its own members to write both pro and conar~uments, thereby precluding <br />any citizen from writing an argument either for or against the measures. <br />The Mayor cited the conditions which apply to arguments for and against <br />bond propositions, stating that if arguments are received from associations <br />and individuals, it places the responsibility on the City Clerk to decide which <br />is the bona fide argument for or agaillst. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Villa, and <br />unanimously carried, Resolution~I.-20 was approved authorizing Councilman <br />Herrin to write the argument in favor of Proposition A, with Councilmen <br />Patterson, Villa, Yamamoto, and Mayor Griset also authorized to sign; <br />and Councilman Patterson to write the argument in favor of Proposition B, <br />with Councilmen Evans, Villa, Yamamoto, and Mayor Griset also authorized <br />to ~ign. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Villa, to authorize <br />Councilman Markel to write the opposition argument to Proposition A, and <br />Councilman Herrin to write the argument against Propositinn B, carried on <br />the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Herrin, Markel, Patterson, <br />Evans, Yamamoto <br />None <br /> <br />Villa, Griset <br /> <br />RECESS <br /> <br />all Council members present. <br /> <br />At 5:00 P.M., a five-minute <br />recess was declared. Council <br />reconvened at 5:10 P. M., with <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />-40- <br /> <br />February 1, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.