Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC PROPERTY USE Application for Special License <br /> to Use Public Property, filed by <br /> the Orange County Model-'T Club, <br />to use the area east of ColT&munity Center Building and extending east on parking <br />area, on Sunday~ May 2, 1971, 6:30 A. lvi., to 5:00 P. lVi., for exchange meet <br />limitedto antique car parts, primarilyModel-T Ford accessories, was approved <br />on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Councilman Patterson and <br />unanimously carried. <br /> <br />ORD. NS-1067 ORDINANCE NS-1067 AMENDING <br />DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT FEES THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL <br /> CODE BY AMENDING SECTION <br />34-193 THEREOF RELATING TO DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT FEES was presented <br />for first reading. This matter was postponed from the February 1, 1971, meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Griset read a Notice of Resolution filed by the Chamber of Commerce dated <br />February lZ, 1971, concerning this matter, and opened the public hearing. Mr. <br />Don Christeson, President of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce, and Mr. Royce <br />Coln, representing the Building Industry Association of California, spoke in <br />opposition to this ordinance. Opposition was based primarily on the amount of the <br />increase in fees; both opponents stated that they felt a 57% increase at this time <br />would bring the assessment to 50"/0 of present-day costs and would be acceptable; <br />that any greater increase in fees would detract from the desirability of future <br />development in the City of Santa Ana; that new developers should not be required <br />to contribute to general drainage assessments on already developed land in addition <br />to their own portion of costs on new constructinn. Mr, Andrew Kral~pman also <br />spoke in favor of the Chamber of Commerce and Building Industry Association's <br />position, stating that it must be kept in mind that a drainage fee is not a tax on a <br />developer, but actually a levy on certain elements of Santa Ana's population. <br /> <br />Councilman Evans' motion to continue this matter to the next Council meeting, <br />instructing the City Attorney to revise the Ordinance to reflect a 57% increase <br />in fees based on Column #3 of the Drainage Assessment Fee report, was seconded <br />by Councilman Yamamoto. <br /> <br />RECESS <br /> <br />all Council members present. <br /> <br />At 9:10 P. A/., a five-minute <br />recess was declared. The meeting <br />reconvenedat 9:Z0 P.M., with <br /> <br />ORD. NS~1067 <br />DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT FEES - (Continued) <br /> <br />The following persons also spoke in opposition to the ordinance, <br />the increase in fees was excessive: <br /> <br />stating they felt <br /> <br />Mr. Art Weaver, Vice President, B.J. Fibres, Inc., 2701S. Bi~ch; <br />Mr. Van Stevens, 1840 E. 17th Street; Mr. Robert Fair, Board of <br />Directors~ Orange County Apartment House Association. Mr. Loran <br />Norton, 193Z Griset, requested clarification as to how this Ordinance <br />would affect the tax rate; the City Manager estimated less than 10~ over <br />a ten-year period. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />-61- <br /> <br />February 16, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />