03-01-1971 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL NO. 260, VA 70-77 YSIDRO AND ANITA RUVALCAVA - (Continued) The Clerk reported that no written communications had been received. There were no further proponents or opponents, and the Mayor declared the public hearing closed. After further discussion, the consensus was that a variance of this type cannot be granted without the time limitation imposed by Condition 8; and that Mr. Ruvalcava is willing to comply with the street dedication as provided in Condition 9; that since there is to be no construction on the property at this time, Conditions 10 through 14 could be waived but would be required in connection with any future application for a building permit° Councilman Villa's motion, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, to grant the appeal and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution granting the Appeal subject to conditions of approval 1 through 9 submitted by the Planning Department, carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Herrin, Evans, Markel, Patterson, Villa, Yamamoto, Griset None None PUBLIC HEARING The Mayor opened the public hearing APPEAL NO. 261, CUP 71-2 on the Appeal filed by W.D. Rush - W.D. RUSH Santa Ana Towing, appealing Planning Cornmission's denial of Conditional Use Permit 71-Z to permit dismantling of vehicles and retail sales of vehicle parts in the M 2 District at 665 South Santa Fe Street. The applicant was present and stated that he is asking for permission only to dis- mantle and sell parts from cars brought to his place of business; that this is a wrecking or salvage operation and there is no intent of making it so; that he keeps the area clean, and has attempted to make the area attracilu~by means of screening and landscaping. In response to questions from the Council, Mr. Rush stated that afte~ the cars are dismantled and all possible parts sold, the frame will be sold to a junk dealer and will not be stored on his lot. Mr. William B. Eisner, owner of the property directly south of the Rush property, stated that he had been asked by Harley-Davidson and several others surrounding this facility to represent them in their appeal to have this variance denied because they believe that if this variance is granted there will be a possibility that the use could be changed to wrecking or salvage, and the stacking of vehicles; that any change in the variance which would not limit the salvage aspect would be detrimental to the area~ The Clerk reported that no written communications had been received. There were no further proponents or opponents, and the Mayor declared the public hearing closed. CITY COUNCIL -81- Marchl, 1971