Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SESSION At Z:15 P. M., the meeting was <br /> adjourned to an Executive Session <br /> to consider the resignation of <br />City Attorney William L. Mock, and a possible appointment to the Freeway <br />Committee to fill a vacancy caused by the resignation of one of its members. <br />The meeting reconvened at 3:35 P.M., with all Council members presel~t. <br /> <br />Councilman Markel asked that DeMotay member Mike Cosgrove, who attended <br />the luncheon at noon and was present in the audience, be recognized. Mr. , <br />Cosgrove spoke briefly, congratulating his counterpart, City Attorney William <br />L. Mock. <br /> <br />RECRUITMENT OF The Mayor reported that the Executive <br />CITY ATTORNEY Session dealt with the procedure in <br /> regard to hiring a replacement for City <br />Attorney William L. Mock. Director of Personnel Donald E. Bott submitted a <br />letter setting forth possible procedures. The Council was not unanimous in their <br />feeling about the procedure to follow. Councilmen Evans and Herrin felt that the <br />position should be filled from within the City if possible. Motion of Councilman <br />Herrin, seconded by Councilman Evans, to name Mr. James A. Withers as <br />Acting City Attorney, was unanimously carried. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Councilman Patterson to authorize the Staff to recruit for <br />the position of City Attorney in accordance with the procedure agreed upon, whereby <br />the City Council will name two attorneys to work with the Director of Personnel in <br />screening applications to approximately ten attorneys; then the Qualifications <br />Appraisal Interview Board, to be comprised of a leading City Attorney from a large <br />municipality, the County Counsel, and an attorney in private practice (preferably <br />the head of a major law firm), will screen that number to 3 - 5 attorneys, who in <br />turn will be interviewed by the City Council for final selection. Motion was seconded <br />by Councilman Villa, and carried on a 5 - 2 vote, Councilmen Herrin and Evans <br />voting NO. <br /> <br />AGENDA ORDER Councilman Patterson' s motion, <br /> seconded by Councilman Markel, <br /> to consider Agenda Items 20, 21, and <br />41 next, in that order, was unanimously carried. <br /> <br />RES. 71-21 <br />HELEN J. PETERSON <br /> AND DENYING APPEAL ON APPEAL <br />APPLICATION 257 FILED BY HELEN J. PETERSON was unanimously deferred to <br />the meeting of April 5, 1971, on motion of Councilman Villa, seconded by Councilman <br />Herrin, on request of Mr. Roger Howell of Rutan & Tucker, Attorneys, 401 Civic <br />Center Drive West, who was present to represent the applicant. He stated that his <br />office was just recently contacted by Mr. Peterson and that he had not had an <br />opportunity to study the file in the depth justified. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 71-21 AFFIRMING THE <br />DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR; <br /> <br />CITy COUNCIL <br /> <br />-69- Marchl, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />