04-19-1971 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PUBLIC HEARING APPEALS 263 & 264 - (Continued) The Mayor opened the public hearing on Appeal #264 to Variance Application 71-7. Mr. Harold l-~embree, Rinker Development Corporation, stated that Resolution 71-13, Item #19, states that the cost of the traffic signal, which will be of mutual benefit to their own property and The Treasury development, shall be shared equally between developers and shall be installed by the first developeL that Rinker Development Corporation believes the cost should be shared proportionately to the size of the property; that they are glad to pay their proportionate share which, based on acreage, they believe to be approximately Z3~0; and that the Minutes of the February 1, 1971, meeting covering the hearing for The Treasury development, indicate Councilman Patterson's motion was for the cost to be on a proportionate basis. Mr, Hembree also requested that the signal be installed at the time The Treasury is constructed; that it would serve no purpose for The Rinker Development Corporation to have it installed at this time, and they will post a bond for their share. There were no further proponents or opponents in this matter, and the Clerk reported no written communications had been received. The Mayor declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Patterson asked if the development on the east side of the street needs the traffic signal less than that on the west side. The Public Works Director stated the development proposed by Rinker Development Corporation would not necessarily require a signal at this time° He also stated that Public Works Department feels the appeal with respect to cost and timing of installation of the signal is reasonable, but that the staff would have to check percentages for true proportion of costs° Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Villa, to grant appeal #264 and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution granting Variance Application 71-7 subject to conditions of approval contained in Planning Department Comments dated March 8, 1971, except that Condition No. 17 shall be amended to provide that the traffic signal shall be installed by The Treasury development subject to a proportionate reimbursement by the Rinker Development, said proportions to be determined by the Director of Public Works, and that the Rinker Development shall post a bond guaranteeing its proportionate share of the cost of the installation of the traffic signal, carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Villa, Herrin, Griset, Yamamoto, None None Evans, Markel The City Attorney was also asked to prepare a new Resolution reflecting the action of the Council as a result of this appeal, in reference to Resolution 71-13, Item #19. POOL PARLOR APPLICATIONS Letter dated April 7, 1971, from Charles G. Schlegel, Attorney, for 3ohn Paul Morrill, Owner, was presented to the Council~ requesting a reconsideration of the application for pool parlor permit in conjunction with The Sportsman, 4406 W. First Street, which was denied on April 5, 1971. CITY COUNCIL -135- April 19, 1971