Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING <br />APPEAL #267 <br />CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES, <br /> <br />INC. - (Continued) <br /> <br />Reasons for opposition to the appeal were additional noise; additional traffic, <br />making the street more hazardous for school children; encroachment into a <br />residential area; the restaurant's late closing lmours during the summer months; <br />and trash being thrown on property owners' lawns. <br /> <br />There were no further proponents or opponents in this matter, and the Clerk <br />reported no written communications had been received. The Mayor declared <br />the public hearing closed. <br /> <br />Councilman Villa's motion, seconded by Councilman Markel, to grant Appeal <br />#267 and instruct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution granting Variance <br />Application No. 71-14 subject to conditions of approval contained in Planning <br />D~partment Comments dated April 1Z, 1971, carried on the following roll call <br />vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Villa, Markel, Patterson, Herrin, Griset <br />Yamamoto, Evans <br />None <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING Councilman Evans asked to be <br />APPEAL #265 excused during consideration <br />H. & J. MABURY COMPANY of this item since his company, <br /> The First American Title <br />Insurance Company, has an interest in this project, creating a Conflict of <br />Interest. <br /> <br />Mr. Ho R~ Stokes stated that the vote of the Planning Commission on~L.this <br />item was inaccurately reported; that Commissioners Sanders and Parks voted <br />NO, making the vote 3 - Z in favor of den~al of the Variance Application. It <br />was subsequently established that Mr. Stokes' statement was correct. <br /> <br />See Planning Director Wieland stated that there ~ two problems involved in this <br />bLlnutes appeal: (1) intrusion into the R 1 zone along ~g~ Street for parking purposes; <br />c°rrec%i~d (Z) the amount of coverage vs. open space, which the R 4 section of the <br />June 1, Zoning Code states must be 50/50. <br /> ~971 <br /> <br />The Mayor opened the public hearing to consider the appeal, filed by H and 3 <br />Mabury Company, from the Planning Commission denial of Variance Application <br />71-7, to construct a two-story garden apartment development in the R 4 District <br />within 150' of R 1 zoned property, to waive a portion of the required 50 percent <br />open space, and to permit offstreet parking in the R 1 District. The following <br />persons spoke in favor of the appeal: <br /> <br />Mr. H.R~ Stokes, 615 S. Flower Street, Attorney, representing <br />the O.K. Earl Corporation. <br />Mr. Robert La Fon, 1185 Rexford Avenue, Pasadena, Architect, <br />representing the O.K. Earl Corporation. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -149- May 3, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />