Laserfiche WebLink
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX On motion of Councilman <br /> Patterson, seconded by <br /> Councilman Villa, and <br />unanimously carried, letter from Robert L. Citron dated July 15, 1971, <br />requesting consideration of an Transient Occupancy Tax, or "Bed Tax", <br />was referred to staff for study and report at the next regular Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />The City Manager stated that, although there was no recommendation in <br />the Budget for any increases or new sources of revenue, there is an <br />obligation to increase the income for the garbage and trash operation; that <br />the source of revenue should be those being served; and that there will be <br />a recommendation presented to Council for an increase in the trash rate. <br /> <br />AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY Councilman Herrin stated that <br /> he had only recently received <br /> a copy of the Staff's <br />Affirmative Action report; that he had not had time to study it thoroughly, <br />and moved to continue the matter to the next regular Council meeting. <br />Councilman Markel seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Other members of the Council were in favor of considering the report at <br />this meeting. After discussion, Councilman Herrin stated that as maker <br />of the motion it was not his intent to take any action to refrain from <br />discussing the matter at this meeting; but that he did not wish to take any <br />official action to adopt or to finalize the policy at this meeting. With the <br />consent of the second, he withdrew his motion. <br /> <br />The Mayor opened lhe matter for discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Jesse Berry, 622 S. Townsend, stated that he wished lo speak, but <br />would prefer to hear the Council's comments first. <br /> <br />The consensus of the C~uncil was that the goals mentioned in the report could <br />be supported. Councilman Herrin stated that he objected to the requirement <br />that contractors must maintain an ethnic balance in a percentage the same as <br />exists in the community; thai this would be discriminating against the employer. <br />Council questioned whether this program applies only to private contractors or <br />also to the City; what determines the percentage--the City population or the <br />entire area; and whether job requirements could be reduced to allow hiring of <br />less skilled individuals. Councilman Evans requested clarification of Phase 3. <br /> <br />Staff stated that the report presently submitted concerns the contractor <br />Compliance phase only; thai many ethnic groups have not found their way into <br />some of the higher-paying craft jobs because of lack of training, and Phase 3 <br />would provide such training; and that Part 2 of the report would deal with the <br />City's hiring practices. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -257- July 19, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />