10-04-1971 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RECESS At 6:00 P.M., the meeting was recessedto 7:30 P.M., at which time it was reconvened with all Council members present. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, the Invocation was given by the Reverend Neal Jensen of the First United ~Methodist Church. PUBLIC AUCTION The Mayor announced the sale of SALE OF CITY OWNED real property located at 1830 Civic REAL PROPERTY Center Drive West (Surplus Property Report 71-08), on which the City had received a bid of $4,000.00 from Mr. Juan Pantoja, through Ponce Realty, The Mayor invited additional bids on the property from any- one present; after three calls with no response, the Mayor declared the property sold to Mr. Pantoja, whose cashier's check in the amount of $400.00 was deposited with the City Treasurer. The Mayor announced the sale of real property located at 726 North English Street (Surplus Property Report 71-09)~ on which the City had received a bid of $5,000.00 from Mr. Juan Pantoja, through Ponce Realty. The Mayor invited additional bids on the property from anyone present; after three calls with no response, the Mayor declared the property sold to Mr. Pantoja, whose cashier's check in the amount of $500.00 was deposited with the City Treasurer. PUBLIC HEARING The Mayor announced that the APPEAL #279 - VA 71-48 Robert H. Grant Co,~ had requested ROBERT H. GRANT CO. coniinuance of their Appeal #279 from Planning Commission's denial of VA 71-48 to construct a 493~unit townhouse development in the R 1 zone at 230 W. Segerstrom (Dyer). Appeal #279 was continued to the next Council meeting, October 18, 1971, on motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, and unanimously carried. PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL #280 CUP 71-23 CHARLES AND MARGARET J. HUFF in an existing single family residence in Street. The Mayor requested a staff report on Appeal #280 filed by Charles and Margaret J. Huff appealing the Planning Commission's denial of CUP 71-23 to allow a rest home the R 1 District al 910 N. Sheffield The Planning Director called attention to the reasons for denial: That a rest home would be an improper use in the R 1 zone; that the homes should provide more amenities; and that applicants who want to change a use from a single- family residence to a commercial rest home without changing the structure should be discouraged. In addition, the Commission believed that the noise generated by the many small children in the immediate neighborhood would be detrimental to the elderly persnns in the rest home. CITY COUNCIL -331- Oclober 4, 1971