Laserfiche WebLink
<br />According to the project geotechnical report and the City's <br />General Plan Land Use Element EIE I the proj ect site does not <br />contain any unique geologic features. Therefore, implementation <br />of the proposed proj ect would not result in adverse impacts to <br />any unique geologic feature. <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />In the project located on strata or soil that is unstable <br />or that would become unstable as a result of the proj ect <br />and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral <br />spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br /> <br />Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated <br /> <br />According to the project geotechnical report, <br />rials on the ro'ect site consist of fine <br />silts with small amounts of mlca presen~ an <br />over the last 10,000 years by flood plain or deposition. <br />The project geotechnical report concluded that construction of <br />the proposed project would be geotechnically feasible with <br />design recommendations incorporated into the project. <br /> <br />the earth <br />sands and sandy <br /> <br /> <br />Mitigations Measures <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The geotechnical recommendations identified in the <br />Preliminary Soils and Foundation Eeport prepared by H&T <br />Soils testing, February 2004 shall be incorporated into <br />plans and specifications. <br /> <br />E. <br /> <br />Where sewers are not available for the disposal <br />wastewater is the soil capable of supporting the use <br />septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? <br /> <br />of <br />of <br /> <br />No Impac t <br /> <br />The project site is located within urban setting <br />service is available. The proposed proj ect would <br />septic tanks or alternative disposal systems. <br /> <br />where sewer <br />not requlre <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />'6B~44 <br />