My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - AMEND APL 2004-004 Map 16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
08/16/2004
>
75B - AMEND APL 2004-004 Map 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:22 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 4:08:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
8/16/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />residents would continue to use existing recreational facilities <br />lTI the City. Implementation of the proposed project would result <br />lTI minimal increases in the City's population and would have <br />less than a significant impact on the demand for existing or new <br />recreation facilities. <br /> <br />XV, TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Cause an increase in traffic, <br />relation to the existing traffic <br />street system? <br />Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of <br />service standard established by the county congestion <br />management agency for designated roads or highways? <br /> <br />which is substantial <br />load and capacity of <br /> <br />in <br />the <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Less Than S~gn~f~cantImpact <br /> <br />The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan. <br />Traffic volumes generated by ~he proposed project would be <br />consistent with the traffic projections In the Circulation <br />Element. No additional circulations improvements would be needed <br />for project related traffic impacts. However, the proposed <br />project would incrementally lDcrease regional traffic impacts <br />within the project area. To mitigate potential regional traffic <br />imDacts the proj ect would be subj ect to Transportation Systems <br />Improvement Pees. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Result in a change <br />either an increase <br />location that results <br /> <br />in air traffic patterns, including <br />in traffic levels or a change in <br />in substantial safety risks? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Implementation of the proposed project would not increase the <br />level air traffic or increase safety risks within the project <br />area. <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Substantially increase hazards to a design feature <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />No significant vehicle or pedestrian safety hazards would be <br />associated with the implementation of the proposed project. <br /> <br />E, <br /> <br />Result in inadequate emergency access <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />2S <br /> <br />pag'f158-57 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.