My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - AMEND APL 2004-004 Map 16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
08/16/2004
>
75B - AMEND APL 2004-004 Map 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:22 PM
Creation date
8/11/2004 4:08:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
8/16/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />daily. Additionally, the proposed project would be required to <br />comply with the City's recycling program for residential uses to <br />reduce the demand for solid waste disposal. Compliance with the <br />City's recycling program would reduce long-term solid waste <br />disposal service impacts to a level considered less than <br />significant. <br /> <br />XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality <br />of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a <br />fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife <br />population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten <br />to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number <br />or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or <br />anJ.mal or elJ.mJ.na te J.mpor1:an 1: eXël..lIlplt::!:::> wI d~t:: ~LI~J U.1. ,p"".¡.. iod:!!! <br />of California history or prehistory. <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />Implementation of the proposed proj ect would not <br />reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species <br />resources, in that no fish, wildlife or cultural <br />known to exist on the project site. <br /> <br />substantially <br />or cultural <br /> <br />resources <br /> <br />are <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Does the project have impacts that are individually limited <br />but cumulatively considerable? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />Implementation of the proposed proj ect would result In <br />cumulative impacts to the environment. However, the proposed <br />project's incremental contribution would not be considered <br />cumulatively considerable because the proposed project would <br />comply with the applicable requirements of the uniform building <br />code, conditions of approval and mitigation measures, which <br />provide specific requirements that would avoid any significant <br />cumulative impacts within the project area. Furthermore, the <br />incremental impacts associated with the proposed proj ect would <br />be at a level where there would not be considered cumulatively <br />considerable. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Does the project have environmental <br />cause substantial adverse effects on <br />directly or indirectly? <br /> <br />effects which will <br />human beings either <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />~B~61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.