11-01-1971 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AMENDMENT APPLICATION 687 O.M. AND THELMA MILLIKEN - (Continued) The Director of Planning stated that this application is for rezoning from R 1 to C 2 of approximately 1.2 acres; that the General Plan for this area called for industrial development, however, surrounding areas have actually gone into various kinds of residential development; that the Staff recommended denial because this would be an intrusion of a commercial parcel into an otherwise predominantly residential area. The Clerk reported no written communications had been received. There were no proponents or opponents on this matter, and the Mayor closed the public hearing~ In response to a question~ from the Mayor, the Director of Planning stated this matter could be handled on a variance; that if the property is rezoned to C 2, it would open the way for many uses not in harmony with the surrounding development. Amendment Application 687 was denied on motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Evans, and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Patterson, Evans, Herrin, Griset, Yamamoto, Markel Villa None AMENDMENT APPLICATION 688 The Mayor opened the public hearing SANTA ANA PLANNING COMMISSION on Amendment Application 688 initiated by the Planning Commission to rezone property bounded by the Southern Pacific right-of-way on the north, a line appr(~ximately 164' south of the centerline of Emmett Street on the south~ Halladay Street on the west, and the City limits on the east, from the M 1 District to the R 2 District. The Direcior of Planning stated that in 1946 this property was zoned M 1. In the years following, it was never developed as industrial, and in 1960, on recommenda- tion of the Planning Commission, the City Council changed the zoning from M 1 to R 2. However, the legal description adopted at that time did not include the Emmett subdivision. Building permits have been issued over the years for the entire development for residential purposes. Recently, in negotiation with an applicant for use of the property, it was discovered that the legal description had been in error and that the property actually was M 1. This request for rezoning reflects the present use of the property, and Council is requested to consider corrective action. The Clerk reported no written communications had been received, There were no proponents or opponents in this matter, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Amendment Application 688 was approved and ORDINANCE NS-1097 CHANGING ZONING CLASSIFICATION ON AMENDMENT APPLICATION 688 INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 30-5-9 (EXHIBIT A.A; 688-A) was passed to second reading on motion of Councilman Evans, seconded by Councilman Herrin, and carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Evans, Herrin, Villa, Griset, Yamamoto, Patterson, Markel None None CITY COUNCIL -362 - November 1, 1971