Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING <br />OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br /> CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />November 15, 1971 <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 2:10 P.M. in the Council Chambers of <br />the City Hall Annex, 530 North Ross Street, with the following Councilmen <br />present: Vernon S. Evans, Wade Herrin, J. Ogden Markel, Ray Villa, <br />Harry K. Yamamoto, and Mayor Lorin Griset. Councilman Jerry M. <br />Patterson was absent for the afternoon session but arrived at 7:30 P.M. <br />Also present were City Manager Carl J. Thornton, City Attorney James <br />A. Withers, Director of Planning Herbert Wieland, Director of Public <br />Works Ronald Wolford, and Clerk of the Council Florence I. Malone. <br /> <br />MINUTES Councilman Markel stated he <br /> wished to make a correction to <br /> the Minutes of the Regular meeting <br />of November 1, 1971. By general consent of the Council, approval of the Minutes <br />was postponed until later in the evening. <br /> <br />AGENDA ORDER The Mayor announced that Mr. Dale <br /> H. Heinly, Attorney for Mr. and Mrs. <br /> Milliken, was present in the audience <br />and had requested that Agenda Item #55 be considered first, if possible. Council- <br />man Herrings motion, seconded by Councilman Evans, to consider Item #55 next, <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />AMENDMENT APPLICATION #687 Mr. Dale H. Heinly, 611 Civic Center <br />O.M. AND THELMA MILLIKEN Drive West, representing O.M. and <br /> Theima Milliken, requested <br />reconsideration of A.A. #687 to rezone property located on Lyon Street between <br />Chestnut Avenue and Warren Street from the R 1 District to the C 2 District. He <br />stated it was his understanding thai the basis for denial at the November 1st meeting <br />was the intrusion of commercial into a predominantly residenlial area; that since <br />the hearing, a tenant, Orco Alarm, has agreed to develop the property for their <br />own use. <br /> <br />The Mayor stated that it was his belief that the Council was favorable to a <br />community/commercial type use, but they felt the correct approach would be by <br />variance rather than rezoning. It was established thai both procedures would <br />require approximately the same amount of time to process. <br /> <br />In response to questions from the Council, the Director of Planning stated that <br />this is an office-type use except that service vehicles, which are away during the <br />day, are stored on site at night; and that the Planning Department recommends this <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -372- November 15, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />