My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-06-1971
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1971
>
12-06-1971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:31 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 10:26:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/6/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AMENDMENT APPLICATION 689 The Mayor read a letter from <br />MARVIN M. ROHRS ", ~ Pacific Investments, Inc., <br /> requesting that the hearing on <br />A.A. 689 filed by Marvin M. Rohrs to prezone a parcel of land located on <br />the north side of Santa Clara Avenue between Old Grand Street and Tustin <br />Avenue previously prezoned 60-A1-7200 (A 1 in unincorporated Orange County) <br />to the R 2 District, be continued to February 7 1972, in order to provide <br />specific plans and more detailed knowledge to those in the area who are <br />interested. <br /> <br />Mr. Van Stevens of Pacific Investments stated that it was their understanding <br />that considerable concern was expressed by persons from the neighborhood <br />during the Planning Commission hearing; that since there was no rush on the <br />project, they felt that if they submitted a full, detailed proposal on a <br />variance, it would be possible to set the conditions that would possibly receive <br />the support of the neighborhood; that they asked for continuance to February <br />in order to avoid continuing it into the Holidays. <br /> <br />Mrs. Demetra Rosier, 2506 N. Linwood, spoke against the Amendment <br />Application and continuance of the hearing. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson explained that this matter is a zone change whicll iS <br />not restrictive as to development; that if the developer returns on February <br />7 with a variance application, conditions of approval can be required. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson's motion, seconded by Councilman Villa, to continue <br />the public hearing on Amendment Application 689 to the regular meeting of <br />February 7, 1972, carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Patterson, Villa, Evans, Herrin, Griset, <br />None <br />Yamamoto <br /> <br />Markel <br /> <br />RECESS <br /> <br />Councilmen present. <br /> <br />At 8:50 P.M., aten-minute recess <br />was declared. The meeting recon- <br />vened at 9:00 P.M. with the same <br /> <br />AMENDMENT APPLICATION 691 The Mayor opened the public <br />J. EUGENE ROI-IRS hearing on Amendment Application <br /> 691 filed by J. Eugene Rohrs to <br />rezone property located on the north side of Seventeenth Street, between <br />Santiago Street and Lincoln Avenue, from the C 4 and R lB Districts to the <br />R 2 and C 1 Districts. <br /> <br />The Planning Director reviewed the Amendment Application. Mr. Van Stevens, <br />1840 E. 17th Street, stated that the property under consideration is the sole <br />remaining undeveloped property in the immediate area; that the project has <br />been discussed with the property owners to the north; and he presented a petition <br />supporting the proposal which had been signed by all but four people in the area. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -407- December 6, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.