Laserfiche WebLink
APPLICATION FOR PAWNBROKER'S CERTIFICATE - (Continued) <br /> <br />There were no further proponents or opponents in the matter, and the Cl~rk <br />reported no written communications had been received. The Mayor closed <br />the public hearing. <br /> <br />After further discussion concerning the status of the partnership, Council- <br />man I-Ierrin moved to deny the appeal filed by Robert Borgerson from Police <br />Chief's denial of a Certificate to engage in the business of a pawnbroker in <br />the City of Santa Ana. The motion was seconded by Councilman Evans, and <br />carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Herrin, Evans, Griset, <br />Villa, Patterson <br />Yamamoto <br /> <br />Markel <br /> <br />APPEAL #285 The Mayor opened the public <br />VA 71-56 hearing on Appeal #285 filed <br />ALFRED NEVILLE WEST by Alfred Neville West appealing <br /> the Planning Commission's denial <br />of VA 71-56 to use an existing single family residence as an office in the tt 2 <br />District at 1264 E. 14th Street. <br /> <br />The Director of Planning stated that the area is predominantly residential and <br />there would be a requirement that the applicant provide one offstreet parking <br />space for each office created; that because of the location on Grand Avenue, it <br />would not be possible to permit access to the property from Grand due to heavy <br />traffic; that it is not possible to work out the required parking; and that if a <br />variance is granted, it will run with the property and there wbuld be no control <br />over the owner of the property if it should be sold. He stated that both the staff <br />and the Planning Commission recommended denial. <br /> <br />Mr. Dale I-Ieinly, Attorney, 611 Civic Center Drive West, spoke on behalf of <br />the applicant and submitted a letter to the Council in the matter. He disagreed <br />that the area is predominantly residential and stated it is in transition from <br />residential to commercial; that if the variance is granted, a condition could be <br />imposed limiting it to the applicant and his particular use; that this will be an <br />artist center to create ideas for advertisers and that clients do not come to <br />the premises; that the only parking necessary would be for five employees. <br /> <br />Mr. Charles Cohen, 1404 N. Grand, spoke in favor of the appeal. He stated <br />he is the owner of the property and has had difficulty over the past four years <br />in renting it as a residence; that it is a poor location for a residence, and the <br />people who move into it are of a transient nature; that he cannot keep it rented <br />to a reliable tenant. <br /> <br />Mr. Neville West, 2113 N. Millwood, the applicant, stated that he wished to <br />develop the property in a good manner; that his objective is to ultimately construct <br />an 1800 square foot building on the property, hopefully in the next ttxr~e years; <br />that he would prefer not to have the variance restricted to him alone; that <br />traffic and parking should be no problem. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -409- December 6, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />