01-03-1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RECESS present. At 8:45 P~M.,~a recess was declared. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 P.M. with all Councilmen APPEAL #288 The Mayor opened the public hearing CUP 71-34 on Appeal #288 filed by Robert R. ROBERT R. WASHER Washer appealing the requirements for lighting fee, trees, and 4' decorative wall contained in Conditional Use Permit 71-34, approved by the Planning Commission, allowing retail sales in the M 1 District at 3500 W. 17th Street (Westminster). The Director of Public Works stated that Condition 6-D of the Commission report was amended to read" . $1095.00 or subject to review.. "He stated that the bond involved has been recalculated, and for sidewalk and tre~s it would amount to $446.00 and the street lights would be $103.00, for a total of $549.00; that Public Works feels this is a reasonable requirement for any commercial enterprise, and particularly on 17th Street. The Director of Planning stated that the 4' decorative wall is a standard requirement to screen parking, and that staff feels the requirement is reasonable and should be retained. Robert R. Washer, 12615 Lighthouse,Lane, Corona del Mar, stated he had come before the Council because his neighbor to the east had not been required to comply with the same conditions, and he was asking for the same consideration to be given to him. He presented pictures of the two properties. He also stated that the Planning Commission had stipulated that there would be no curbside parking along Seventeenth Street in front of his building, but there is parking in front of the office next to his. There were- no further proponents or opponents and the Clerk reported no written communication had been received on the matter. The Mayor closed the public hearing~ In discussing the "No Parking" on 17th Street, the Director of Public Works stated they are trying to warn potential developers that there will be no parking on the major arterial system; that it doesn't mean now, but eventually. Councilman Patterson stated he felt that flue information presented was incomplete and would like to refer the matter to staff for further report. Councilman Herrin's motion, seconded by Councilman Yamamoto, to refer Appeal #288 to staff for further information and report on January 17, 1972, carried on the following roll call vote: AYES: Herrin, Yamamoto, Villa, Evans, Patterson NOES: Griset, Markel ABSENT: None CITY COUNCIL -13- January 3, 1972