Laserfiche WebLink
COMPENSATION REQUESTS - (Continued) <br /> <br />Mr. Lynn Jeffries, 4409 W. Camille, Apt. B, stated that in order to preserve a <br />well ordered and secure society we need the stabilizing influence of a police force <br />that is consistent and adequate; that this is contingent upon adequate compensation; <br />that he personally appreciates the service of the Police force; that if present trends <br />continue the City will have serious problems; and for these reasons he would like to <br />support the recommendations and proposals made by the Police Association. <br /> <br />Mr. Louis Caudillo, 515 S. Flower, stated that the Fire Department sponsors the <br />Glass Mountain Inn for physically handicapped people; that he is in favor of wage <br />increases for both the Fire and Police Depart~nent personnel. <br /> <br />Mr. John Kingsman, 221~ N. Arden, stated he has been in apositionfor the past <br />ten to fifteen years where he has .dealt with Fire and Police Departments through- <br />out California and neighboring states; that he can testify to the statements made in <br />regard ' to the morale problems the City is confronted with; that we cannot wait <br />and watch other cities progress when we are confronted with our own problems; that <br />these men have tak-an the oath to serve the public, and now it is up to the public to <br />serve them and help them. <br /> <br />The City Manager stated he would like to try to keep the record straight. He stated <br />he had never met Mr. Nemelka in any kind of meet and confer situation; that in <br />November he met Mr. Montejano for the first time and since then there has never <br />been a member of the Police Department sitting in session with management in <br />regard to any of its problems; that he has met with Mr. Silver time after time, and <br />he has been accompanied by one member of the Fire Department who never made a <br />contribution either for or against any of the discussions. He stated that the information <br />presented by Mr. Montejano at the hearing was never presented in any of the <br />discussions; that certain things were demanded with no support whatever; that he has <br />gone on record that the so-called California Highway Patrol 2% at 50 is not in the <br />public interest; that it would cost the City about $350,000 a year just for the Police <br />and Fire Departments. He stated that the information presented did not take into <br />consideration the increase in the patrolman's pay rate over a ten year period from <br />$600 to $1038, with a possible maximum of $1176; that the City was prepared to go <br />forward with an incentive program up to $1234, but that no longer has the support of <br />Mr. Montejano; that there is an incentive program for patrolmen which includes <br />Sergeants and Lieutenants; that it does not include Investigators because it is hoped <br />to get those men back into the field where they will provide the greatest amount of <br />service to the people of the community; that for ten years the factor of clearance <br />upon arrest has been 40% or higher; that Santa Ana is not a crime-ridden city; that <br />it is the fourth lowest of all the major cities of California; that the rate of increase <br />has not been as great as for the state as a whole. He stated that the turn-over rate <br />in police personnel in the City of Santa Ana is less than the turn-over rate in any - <br />other city of a similar type and size; that the largest turn-over figure is during the <br />one-year probation; that this City lets more men go during the first year of <br />employment than any other Police Department. He stated that the~level of reward <br />has been given serious consideration every year; that for many,rears it has been the <br />principle of the City of Santa Ana to make changes in rates of pay or in fringe benefit <br />grants as of the first of September; that an investigation was made-of how many <br />policemen were required to work during their lunch hour, and it was learned that 3% <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -34- January 17, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />