Laserfiche WebLink
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY - (Continued) <br /> <br />There were no further proponents or opponents in the matter, the Assistant Clerk <br />reported no written communications had been received, and the Mayor closed the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />In response to questions from Council, David Tayco, Assistant to the City Manager, <br />stated that several months ago Larry Ogden, President of UTO, informed him that <br />the Tustin Cab Company was operating vehicles which had the exact identity and <br />markings as UTO--a white vehicle which contained the letters UTO-Tustin Cab Company. <br />He stated that Mr. Ogden presented a fictitious firm name filed with the Orange County <br />Recorder's Office; that the Santa Ana Code does not specify that a taxi must operate with <br />a particular identity and he had informed Mr. Ogden he could operate, using the White <br />Cab Company name; and that they are still UTO dba White Cab Company, which is not <br />in violation of the Code. He stated that UTO did not meet the insurance requirements <br />of the Code; thai the validity of UTO's corporate status was in question; that UTO was <br />doing business without the approval of the Federal Communications Commission; that <br />later, he was informed that they had a temporary license but it had expired; that in <br />December of 1971 he wrote a letter to Larry Ogden informing him that in addition to the <br />violations previously mentioned, he was operating more than ten taxicabs, which was <br />the total number permitted by Council several years, ago, and that it was Mr. Ogden's <br />contention that Council had given him permission to operate ten cabs at any given time-- <br />ten for one eight-hour period, another ten for the next eight-hour period, and another <br />ten for the third eight-hour period--or a total of 30 vehicles in 24 hours. Mr. Tayco <br />further stated that permits issued by the City were encased in plastic by UTO, Inc., <br />and were affixed to the rear trunk lid of the cabs, and that they were switched at will <br />from one cab to another; that as a result of a court order obtained by Gordon Wiggins, <br />the Marshal's office took possession of the UTO cabs and delivered them to the Tustin <br />Cab Company; that he went to the location where they were stored and counted 22 cabs <br />that had evidence of a license having been affixed to the rear bumper; that he later <br />determined that some of the permits fixed to the vehicles were originally Sold to <br />cigarette machines or gum ball machines. He stated that at that time he requested <br />proof that UTO was actually a corporation; that the records showing the existence of <br />UTO were presented to the City Attorney's office and the stipulation was made that UTO <br />was a legal corporation; that he issued 1972 permits for ten vehicles and had them <br />affixed to the rear windows of ten taxicabs; that approximately two weeks ago, Larry <br />Ogden and Gordon Wiggins informed him they were no longer in disagreement with <br />each other and wished to operate from the same location, 1001 N. Logan, which has been <br />the continuous location of the Tustin Cab Company; that part of the reason for changing <br />to the ne%v location was so thai UTO cars could avail themselves of the insurance that <br />was written for Tustin Cab Company. He stated that he had in his possession driver's <br />manifests indicating that during a 5-1/2 month period, cabs were dispatched in the City <br />of Santa Ana by the Tustin Cab Company; that in the last two months the Police Depart- <br />ment has issued citations against the vehicles operated by Tustin Cab Company, <br />charging them with operating without a license, operating without a Certificate of <br />Public Convenience and Necessity~ soliciting passengers in the City of Santa Aha; and <br />operating without proper insurance coverage. <br /> <br />Councilman Villa stated that he did not believe in monopolies; that competition pro- <br />vides better service to the City. Mayor Griset stated he is infavor of competition, but <br />does not believe the public convenience and necessity was established by C & S Tours. <br />Councilman Patterson stated that in discussions of monopolies and free enterprise, <br />cabs, buses and ambulances tend to fall into the same category as telephone and <br />electric light companies; that competition tends to bring down rates and prices; how- <br />ever, with bus and cab companies, cutting of costs downgrades the level of service. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -66- February 7, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />