Laserfiche WebLink
RES. 7Z-4Z RESOLUTION 72-42, ~,SPECIAL <br />CITY EMBLEM RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADOPTING <br />THE NEW EMBLEM SIGNIFYING THE CITY OF SANTA ANA was adopted on motion <br />of Councilman Herrin, seconded by Council-man Yamamoto, and carried on a 6-1 <br />vote, Councilman Markel dissenting. <br /> <br />Councilman Markel asked that the following statement be incorporated into the <br />Minutes: <br /> <br />"Believe it or not, Santa Ana has its first official em~em since <br />its founding in 1869. Adapting an official emblem is a~rather <br />improtant procedure within a community and surely t~ us in Santa <br />Aha, because in over one hundred years we have never had an <br />official emblem. I believe it is important enough in Santa Ana <br />to give it more concern than to permit its design to be made and <br />approved in a corner of City Hall and then quickly passed on to <br />City Council for approval. . ? <br /> <br />"The design, consisting of an elevation of the new City Hall <br />and the old Orange County Courthouse, surely misses~ihe <br />subject in lending to posterity those things whic~l have,given <br />so much to Santa Ana. Surely the replica of big government <br />is no substitute for a design that would convey into posterity <br />the agricultural, industrial, cultural and christian image of <br />Santa Aha. <br /> <br />"The best of community expression has not been attained <br />in the image as portrayed in the official emblem at hanoi. Open <br />competition within our schools and/or our historical clubs <br />would have developed a much better image in portraying the <br />past, present and future for our City's emblematic character." <br /> <br />RES. 72-40 RESOLUTION 7g-mi0 AUTHORIZING <br />CONDEMNATION OF CONDEMNATION OF REAL PROPERTY <br />REAL PROPERTY FOR THE WIDENING OF FIRST STREET <br /> BETWEEN TOWNSEND AND HESPERIAN <br />was adopted on motion of Councilman Herrin, seconded by C~)uncilman Yarnamoto, <br />and carried on a 6-1 vote, Councilman Markel voting NO. <br /> <br />RES. 72-43 <br />STRUCTURAL TAX EXEMPTION <br /> <br />was read by title only. <br /> <br />On motion of Councilman Patterson, <br />seconded by Councilman Herrin, and <br />unanimously carried, Resolution 72-43 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 72-43 AUTHORIZING PETITION TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS <br />OF ORANGE COUNTY REQUESTING EXCLUSION OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, FROM THE LEVY OF ~,~Y ORANGE <br />COUNTY TAX TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION AND MAKING <br />FINDINGS OF FACT was adopted on motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded <br />by Councilman Markel, and unanimously carried. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL -158- April 17, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />