My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-1972
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
1952-1999
>
1972
>
04-17-1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 2:00:22 PM
Creation date
5/6/2003 10:48:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
4/17/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPEAL #295 <br />VA 72-15 <br />CHARLES B. LINGER - (Continued) <br /> <br />Mrs. Charles B. Linger stated that they had tried to buy the property on numerous <br />occasions, and were not aware that it was for sale when Mrs. Wade purchased it. <br /> <br />There were no further proponents or opponents, and the Mayor closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Councilman Evans stated that, if the variance is approved, he would be in favor <br />of limiting it to one business. <br /> <br />Councilman Markel stated that if the parking requirements are waived, much of the <br />parking for this business would have to be in the public street, denying street <br />parking to other people in the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson stated that he would concur if this were a new building, but <br />this is an existing building which is a legal, non-conforming use, and as such, the <br />fact that they have three parking spaces is a legal use under the present ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilman Herrin stated that la the future, the City will be dealing with many of <br />the same kind of action, and that a formula should be developed in order that Council <br />will have a guideline to follow in considering future requests. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson moved to grant appeal #295 and instruct the City Attorney <br />to prepare a Resolution approving Variance Application 72-15 subject to conditions <br />of approval contained in the Planning Director's report, and vary the parking <br />requirements and standards as they apply to this site. Councilman Villa seconded <br />the motion. <br /> <br />Councilman Evans stated he would be in favor of the motion if it were amended <br />to state that the premises would be limited to two uses. Councilmen Patterson <br />and Villa concurred. The amended motion carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT <br /> <br />Patterson, Villa, Evans, Herrin, Griset, Yamamoto <br />Markel <br />None <br /> <br />CUP 72-3 The Mayor opened the public hearing on' <br />STANDARD OIL COMPANY Conditional Use Permit 7Z-3 filed by <br />OF CALIFORNIA Standard Oil Company of California to <br /> allow the manufacture, distribution and <br />sale of agriculture chemicals in the M Z District at 1016 Santiago Avenue; APPROVED. <br /> <br />The Director of Planning stated that notices were mail'ed, on an occupant basis, <br />to all parcels bordered by Garfield~ Washington, Lincoln and Santa Aha Boulevard, <br />and that each envelope contained a notice in Spanish and one in English; that g68 <br />notices were mailed and 87 were undelivered; that this was due to the Assessor <br />Parcel numbering system. He stated that discussions were held with residents of <br />the area and with a representative of the firm; that the company has been in its <br />present location since 1954; that it was isolated at the time it located there, but <br />during the intervening years, development has taken place; that the plant has been <br />handicapped since the flood several years ago when the railroad bridge was wiped <br />out. He stated that the Planning staff had contacted a tenant who lived in a nearby <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />-165- April 17, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.