Laserfiche WebLink
PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENTS - (Continued) <br /> <br />The City Attorney was instructed to prepare, for inclusion on the April 1973 <br />ballot, proposed Amendments to the Charter to establish the legal voting age <br />at 18 years and to provide, as a qualification for Council candidacy, one year's <br />residenc~g as a qualified elector in the Ward and one year's residency as a <br />qualified ~elector in the City, on the unanimously approved motion of Council- <br />man Herrin, seconded by Councilman Patterson. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 72-76 RESOLUTION 72-76 OF THE <br />BOND PROPOSITIONS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br /> OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA <br />APPROVING A GROUP OF MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS AS CONSTITUTING <br />A CITY PLAN PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 4, DIVISION 4, <br />CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE I OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF <br />CALIFORNIA was adopted on motion of Councilman Villa, seconded by Council - <br />man Patterson, with Councilmen Herrin and Markel dissenting. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 7Z-77 RESOLUTION 7Z-77 OF THE CITY <br />BOND PROPOSITIONS COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA <br />DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY DEMAND THE <br />ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS <br />AND MAKING FINDINGS RELATING THERETO was unanimously adopted on <br />motion of Councilman Patterson, seconded by Councilman Evans. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 7Z-78 RESOLUTION 72-78 OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br /> OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA .. <br />REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE <br />TO CONSOLIDATE A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL BOND ELECTION OF THE CITY <br />OF SANTA ANA TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7," 1972, WITH THE GENERAL <br />ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 1972, PURSUANT TO SECTION <br />23302 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE was adopted on motion of Councilman <br />Patterson, seconded by Councilman Villa, with Councilmen Herrin and Markel <br />dis s enting o <br /> <br />Prior to the vote on Resolutions 72-76, 72-77 and 72-78, discussion was held <br />on the three propositions to be submitted to the voters at the November General <br />Election. <br /> <br />Councilman Herrin stated that he would not support any of the propositions if <br />the park issue were not deleted; and that he could only support the fire and the <br />public works propositions. <br /> <br />Councilman Markel stated that Proposition A is costly and that he would favor <br />reconsidering some of the items in order to make them compatible with what <br />the City is able to accept. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> <br />-300- <br /> <br />JULY Z4, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />