Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING <br />VA 7Z-45 - ARNOLD B. GASSER - (Continued) <br /> <br />There were no opponents to the application and the Mayor closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilman Yamamoto asked if the 39 extra parking spaces could be converted to <br />additional open space. <br /> <br />The Acting Planning Director stated that that remained a possibility, however, it was <br />staff's opinion that there could not be too much parking and that they would actually <br />prefer the extra parking to additional open space. They did believe, however, that <br />there should be 50% open space. <br /> <br />Mayor Griset stated that although he believed that Mr. Hall had come up with a very <br />fine development in terms of appearance of the units, there were too many units on <br />too small an area with too many bedrooms; and that the schools were already crowded. <br />He further stated that he believed the project was inconsistent with the policies which <br />have been established for the development of Southwest Santa Ana. <br /> <br />Councilman Yamamoto stated he could not support the application because of his concern <br />with the lack of open space and the excessive number of bedrooms. He pointed out <br />that guidelines have been established for all of Santa Aha -'not just South Santa Aha. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson asked Mro Hall if units might be sold as condominiums. <br /> <br />Mr. Hall stated that it was conceivable that they might be sold as condominiums. He <br />pointed out;the last three R 2 projects which had been approved in this area had o~tM <br />30%, 34%, and 38.3% open space respectively, all less th~n the, project he proposed. <br /> <br />Councilman Patterson stated that he would support the application; that he was always <br />concerned with open space; however, for two reasons he felt the application should be <br />granted: the first being that the property was only 176' wide which is a difficult width <br />to develop, and the second, that there are proposed only a relatively small number <br />of units, and that it was more difficult to achieve open space with fewer units. He <br />further stated that he believes the ordinance setting forth the 50% open space require- <br />ment is not an ordinance which should govern in this particular situation; that he likes <br />the idea of having central facilities, parking next to unit, and the fact that the units <br />may be sold as condominiums which he always favors since rentals do not encourage <br />home ownership. He further stated that he believes guidelines ,set up for the South <br />Warner area should not be applied all over the city. <br /> <br />Councilman Markel stated that he believed the proposed project was one that might <br />overcome some previous difficulties in that area; and that he was in favor of the <br />application. <br /> <br />Councilman Evans' motion to grant the Variance Application, seconded by Councilman <br />Patterson, carried on the following roll call vote: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Evans, Patterson, <br />Griset, Yamamoto <br />None <br /> <br />Villa, <br /> <br />Her rin, Markel <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -356- SEPTEMBER 5, 1972 <br /> <br /> <br />