My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
03/18/2025
>
Correspondence - Non-Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:16:07 PM
Creation date
3/12/2025 4:42:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
3/18/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Zuniga, Diana <br />From:Susan Miller <smillers@dslextreme.com> <br />Sent:Friday, March <br />To:clerkofboard@aqmd.gov; !City Clerk <br />Subject:RE: Proposed rules 1111 and 1121 <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Hello Please forward this to the proper department- thank you: <br /> <br />To Whom it May Concern: I support AAOC's position that this would be a disastrous regulation and <br />am asking for your help to defeat this bill. As a property manager for many small mom & pop rental <br />owners this would devastate the small rental investors and force them to sell their property. <br />Thank you <br /> <br />https://www.aaoc.com/news/aqmd-moves-to-force-replacement-of-gas-furnaces-and-water- <br />heaters <br /> <br />Proposed rules 1111 and 1121 will be presented for formal consideration and action at the <br />SCAQMD Board Meeting on May 2, 2025. <br />The proposed regulations are extremely problematic. Not only would they impact housing <br />affordability due to the prohibitively high cost of compliance, but there is also insufficient <br />infrastructure to support the increased electrical loads and demand that would be created. <br />Additionally, the regulations would result in countless families being displaced as their rental <br />units would be uninhabitable due to the extensive work and disruption that would result as <br />multifamily properties seek to comply. <br />Compliance will likely cost tens of thousands of dollars - or more - for each rental property in <br />Southern California. <br /> <br /> <br />Respectfully <br />Susan Miller <br />Tustin Resident <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.