10-16-1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CUP 7Z-19 HARVEY BEAR - (Continued) Prior to voting, the Acting City Attorney advised Council that he had recommended that CUP 72-19 be considered apart from the Consent Calendar because of the recent decision by the California Supreme Court in the case of Friends of Mammoth v. Mono County; and that he recommended to Council that the matter be continued, or in the alternative, that the conditional use permit be received and ordered filed subject to conditions that the developer be required to submit an Environmental Impact Statement that the development would not have more than a trivial impact on the environment and that the developer enter into an agreement with the City holding the C'ity harmless from any.liability on the Conditional Use Permit. He further stated that there were as yet no clear guidelines as to what should be considered "trivial," and recommended to Council that an Environmental Impact Evaluator be appointed to ascertain whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be required of a developer; that if required, the statement would be submitted to the Council for a further finding of fact and that Council would still have the discretion to approve the project even if the environmental impact was found to be more than trivial. Mrs. lanice Boer, 912 North Lowell, asked Council to not over-react to the Friends of Mammoth case and hire an evaluator, but rather to wait until after the California Legislature r econvenes. CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS SANTA ANA CITY CENTER ASSOC. & SOUTH MAIN IMPROVEMENT ASSOC. On motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Herrin, and unanimously carried, Council approved the application of SANTA ANA CITY CENTER ASSOCIATION, for Christmas Decorations on both sides of Fourth Street between Broadway and French, from November 19, 1972 to January 7, 1973, subject to compliance with City safety regulations; and approved Christmas Decorations for the SOUTH MAIN IMPROVE- MENT ASSOCIATION from November 19, 1972 to January 7, 1973, subject to compliance with City safety regulations. DEEDS, NO CASH On motion of Councilman Evans, GRANTEE, CITY seconded~by Councilman Herrin, with Councilman Markel voting NO, the Report of No-Cash Deeds accepted by the City Manager, pursuant to Resolution #69-156, from September 28, 1972 through October 11, 1972, inclusive, was received and ordered filed. CHANGE ORDERS the following change order was approved: On motion of Councilman Yamamoto, seconded by Councilman Patterson, with Councilman Markel voting NO, PROJECT 7013, CITY HALL - Audio visuals for Council Chambers; Change Order ~gO, increasing in the amount of $14,482.34° CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -397- OCTOBER 16, 1972